green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Vines
See State v. Jones, 46 Conn. App. 640, 646 , 700 A.2d 710 (“[e]very evidentiary ruling that denies a defendant a line of inquiry to which he thinks he is entitled is not constitutional error”), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 941 , 704 A.2d 797 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. McHolland
See State v. Jones, 46 Conn. App. 640, 646 , 700 A.2d 710 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 941 , 704 A.2d 797 (1997). 8 Although this court will review an unpreservéd constitutional claim if it satisfies the criteria of State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239-40 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989), 9 unpreserved evidentiary claims are not afforded the same protection.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Watts
See id.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Jones, 46 Conn. App. 640, 652 , 700 A.2d 710 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 941 , 704 A.2d 797 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Middlebrook
See State v. Jones, 46 Conn. App. 640, 647 , 700 A.2d 710 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 941 , 704 A.2d 797 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Murray
See State v. Jones, 46 Conn. App. 640, 656 , 700 A.2d 710 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 941 , 704 A.2d 797 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brown
See, e.g., State v. Jones, 46 Conn. App. 640, 652 , 700 A.2d 710 (when defendant charged with conspiracy, prior misconduct evidence admissible to establish relationship between defendant and coconspirators), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 941 , 704 A.2d 797 (1997); see also State v. Harris, 43 Conn. App. 830 , 836–37, 687 A.2d 544 (1996) (when defendant charged with conspiracy to commit murder, evidence of drug operation admissible to show relationship among vari- ous individuals).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Davis
See, e.g., State v. Hill, supra, 237 Conn. 94 -96 (defendant who was charged with possession of illegal drugs seized in warrantless search of apartment in which he had no reasonable expectation of privacy had no standing to challenge search); State v. Altrui, 188 Conn. 161, 178-79 , 448 A.2d 837 (1982) (defendant who was charged with possession of weapons seized in warrantless search of automobile in which he had no reasonable expectation of privacy had no standing to challenge search); see also State v. Maia, 45 Conn. App. 679, 685 , 697 A.2d 707 (rejecting claim that defendant who was charge…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
ERIC MAIA
v.
ERIC MAIA
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 4, 1997.
Louis S. Avitabile, in support of the petition., Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 679 (AC 15623), is denied. See State v. Maia, 243 Conn. 242, 703 A.2d 98 (1997).