Pawling Sav. Bank v. Berkery, 719 A.2d 1175 (Conn. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Pawling Sav. Bank v. Berkery, 719 A.2d 1175 (Conn. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sydoriak v. Zoning Board of Appeals (connappct, 2005-08-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Sydoriak v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mandanici v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 50 Conn. App. 308, 311-12 , 717 A.2d 287 (holding that issue of hardship was not res judicata where certification to appeal was denied), cert. denied, 247 Conn. 935 , 719 A.2d 1174 (1998). 6 Although there are exceptions to this general rule; Carnese v. Middleton, supra, 27 Conn. App. 537 ; no such exceptions are present in this case. 7 This is not to say that Sydoriak I is a nullity in its entirety, but rather that to the extent that Sydoriak II is inconsistent with Sydoriak I, Sydoriak II controls. “[W]hen a prior judgment is not relied upon in a p…
cited Cited "see" State v. Lepri
Conn. App. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Thomas, 50 Conn. App. 369, 382 , 717 A.2d 828 , cert. granted on other grounds, 247 Conn. 935 , 722 A.2d 1217 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Burton
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id.; see also State v. Martinez, 49 Conn. App. 738 , 745– 46, 718 A.2d 22 (declining to second-guess trial court’s assessment that discredited individual’s testimony that she did not consent to search), cert. denied, 247 Conn. 934 , 719 A.2d 1175 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PAWLING SAVINGS BANK
v.
PATRICK J. BERKERY
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 27, 1998.
719 A.2d 1175
Kenneth R. Davis, in support of the petition., Gerald Hecht, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 18292) is denied.