In re Marvin M., 719 A.2d 900 (Conn. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Marvin M., 719 A.2d 900 (Conn. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
63 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bruno v. The Travelers Companies (connappct, 2017-05-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Bruno v. The Travelers Companies
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
Here, once the defendants raised the issue of absolute immunity, based on the application of the litigation privilege, and the court then determined that the plaintiff's initial complaint was barred by the doctrine of absolute immunity, the court should have dismissed the case against the defendants, essentially treating the motion to strike as a motion to dismiss. 6 See Practice Book § 10-30 (a) (1) ("[a] motion to dismiss shall be used to assert ... lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter"); see generally Branford v. Monaco , 48 Conn.App. 216 , 219 n.4, 709 A.2d 582 (although "[t]he de…
discussed Cited "see" Petitte v. DSL. Net, Inc. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Branford v. Monaco, 48 Conn. App. 216, 222 , 709 A.2d 582 (“[m]ere assertions of fact . . . are insufficient to establish the existence of a material fact” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 245 Conn. 903 , 719 A.2d 900 (1998).
cited Cited "see" Skakel v. Benedict, No. Cv98 35 73 86 S (Nov. 10, 1999)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Marvin, 48 Conn. App. 563 , 568-69 , 711 A.2d 756 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 916 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re Appraisal of Regal Entertainment Group
Del. Ch. · 2021 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., Agranoff, 719 A.2d at 900 (applying a premium of 30% to correct for an implicit minority discount; basing adjustment on testimony by expert regarding aggregate control premiums paid in acquisitions of public companies during the valuation year); Bomarko, Inc. v. Int’l Telecharge, Inc., 794 A.2d 1161, 1186 (Del.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wyatt v. Salinas, No. Cv 00 0499602s (Mar. 29, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
As Judge Hartmere has pointed out in Dore v. Salinas, Superior Court, Docket No. 492730 (May 18, 1999, Hartmere, J.) ( 24 Conn.L.Rptr. 584 ), appealed on May 28, 1999 (medical evidence presented at hearing): "Clearly, the hearing officer was entitled to "believe or disbelieve the evidence presented by any witness, even an expert, in whole or in part.' Bancroft v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 48 Conn. App. 391 , 400 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 917 (1998); see also Settani v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 48 Conn. App. 418 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 916 (1998)." CT Page 3741 As indicated, the …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Anderson v. Department of Public Health, No. Cv 99 0494513s (Dec. 20, 1999)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
However, the hearing officer was entitled "to believe or disbelieve the evidence presented by any witness, even an expert, in whole or in part." Bancroft v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles , 48 Conn. App. 391 , 400 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 917 (1998); see also Settani v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles , 48 Conn. App. 418 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 916 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tucker v. State, No. Cv 99 0495547s (Sep. 9, 1999)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
Clearly, the hearing officer was entitled to "believe or disbelieve the evidence presented by any witness, even an expert, in whole or in part." Bancroft v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles , 48 Conn. App. 391 , 400 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 917 (1998); see also Settani v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles , 48 Conn. App. 418 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 916 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Skakel v. Benedict (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Rollinson, supra, [203 Conn.] 654-56; see also In re Marvin M., 48 Conn. App. 563, 573 , [ 711 A.2d 756 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 916 , 719 A.2d 900 (1998)].
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dore v. Salinas, No. Cv 98 0492730s (May 18, 1999)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
Clearly, the hearing officer was entitled to "believe or disbelieve the evidence presented by any witness, even an expert, in whole or in part." Bancroft v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles , 48 Conn. App. 391 , 400 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 917 (1998); see also Settani v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles , 48 Conn. App. 418 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 916 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IN RE MARVIN M.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 25, 1998.
719 A.2d 900
Anthony A. Wallace, in support of the petition., Stephen G. Vitelli, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
Published

The respondents’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 563 (AC 16942), is denied.