green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
1.9 score
“possessor of land has a duty to an invitee to reasonably inspect and maintain the premises in order to render them reasonably safe. . . . in addition, the possessor of land must warn an invitee of dangers that the invitee could not reasonably be expected to discover”
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Grady v. Bella Enterprises, Inc., No. Cv00 37 88 38 S (Apr. 23, 2002)
possessor of land has a duty to an invitee to reasonably inspect and maintain the premises in order to render them reasonably safe. . . . in addition, the possessor of land must warn an invitee of dangers that the invitee could not reasonably be expected to discover
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Considine v. City of Waterbury
Compare McCrorey v. Heilpern, 170 Conn. 220, 222 , 365 A.2d 1057 (1976) (concluding that there was no reasonable basis for jury’s finding of constructive notice because plaintiff proffered no evidence that defective condition existed for any period of time before plaintiffs injury), White v. E & F Construction Co., 151 Conn. 110, 113-14 , 193 A.2d 716 (1963) (evidence that defective condition existed for two minutes before accident was insufficient to charge defendant with constructive notice), and Gulycz v. Stop & Shop Cos., 29 Conn. App. 519, 522 , 615 A.2d 1087 (concluding that trier of f…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vogel v. State, No. Cv 99 0588391 S (Apr. 18, 2002)
In addition, the possessor of land must warn an invitee of dangers that the invitee could not reasonably be expected to discover." (Citations omitted.) Morin v. Bell Court Condominium Assn., Inc. , 223 Conn. 323 , 327 , 612 A.2d 1197 (1992); see also Kurti v. Becker , 54 Conn. App. 335 , 338 , 733 A.2d 916 , cert. denied, 251 Conn. 909 , 739 A.2d 1248 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ALEXANDER KURTI
v.
CAROLYN H. BECKER
v.
CAROLYN H. BECKER
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 21, 1999.
Scott P. Birrell, in support of the petition., Glory Martyn Lena, in opposition.
Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (1)
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 335 (AC 17978), is denied.
Scott P. Birrell, in support of the petition. Glory Martyn Lena, in opposition. Decided October 21, 1999SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.