Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Carabetta, 742 A.2d 362 (Conn. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Carabetta, 742 A.2d 362 (Conn. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Midland Funding, LLC v. Mitchell-James (connappct, 2016-03-15)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Midland Funding, LLC v. Mitchell-James
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See id., 376. ‘‘To admit evidence under the business record exception to the hearsay rule, a trial court judge must find that the record satisfies each of the three conditions set forth in General Statutes § 52-180.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
v.
RALPH CARABETTA FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. SALVATORE P. CARABETTA FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. EVELYN M. CARABETTA FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. SALVATORE R. CARABETTA
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 30, 1999.
742 A.2d 362
Kerry M. Wisser and Nathan A. Schatz, in support of the petition., James W. Oliver and Maria K. Tongas, in opposition.
Published

The petition by the defendants, Ralph Carabetta, Salvatore P. Carabetta, Evelyn M. Carabetta and Salvatore R. Carabetta, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 384 (AC 17923), is denied.

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.