green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.5 score
“the imposition of time constraints on a board's decision-making process may compromise the integrity of its deliberative process.”
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Paul-Emile Berteau v. David E. Glazek
the imposition of time constraints on a board's decision-making process may compromise the integrity of its deliberative process.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Brantley v. City of New Haven
Our conclusion is reinforced by our review of other cases applying the public policy exception. “[T]he cases that have held that a court properly vacated an arbitration award that compelled reinstatement of an employee usually involved some apparent and egregious misconduct on the part of the employee.” Id., 845 ; see, e.g., Groton v. United Steelworkers of America, supra, 254 Conn. 35 (employee arrested and convicted of larceny of employer’s funds); State v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 387, AFL-CIO, 252 Conn. 467 , 747 A. 2d 480 (2000) 12 (employee arrested for making obscene, racist telep…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Connecticut State University Organization of Administrative Faculty, AFSCME, Council 4, Local 2836, AFL-CIO
See id., 802–803.
discussed
Cited "see"
AFSCME, Council 4, Local 2663 v. Dept. of Children & Families
See State v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 2663, AFL-CIO, 59 Conn. App. 793, 801 , 758 A.2d 387 (dismissal for off duty conduct was proper for person employed by department as driver of children in light of Commissioner of Children and Families’ obligation under General Statutes § 17a-90 [a] to ‘‘have general supervision over the welfare of chil- dren who require the care and protection of the state’’), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 905 , 762 A.2d 910 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. AFSCME, COUNCIL 4, LOCAL 391
See State v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 2668, AFL-CIO, 59 Conn. App. 793, 803-804 , 758 A.2d 387 (fact that criminal conduct took place outside workplace not dispositive of whether employee’s reinstatement violated public policy), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 905 , 762 A.2d 910 (2000). 9 The plaintiff had filed its application to vacate the award on October 22, 2007. 10 The letter provided in relevant part: “During the arbitration, the [c] omplainant testified to his statement that [the grievant] stated to him, ‘Hey Homo it’s about time you came downstairs and stop sucking cock.’ He also te…
cited
Cited "see"
City of Ansonia v. Stanley
See State v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 2663, AFL-CIO, 59 Conn. App. 793, 797 , 758 A.2d 387 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 905 , 762 A.2d 910 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. New England Health Care Employees Union, District 1199
See State v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 2663, AFL-CIO, 59 Conn. App. 793, 799 , 758 A.2d 387 (“conclud[ing] that the protection of children, with specific reference to the department, is a clear public policy of this state”), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 905 , 762 A.2d 910 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oudheusden v. Oudheusden
See, e.g., Way v. Way, 60 Conn. App. 189, 197 , 758 A.2d 884 (trial court improperly terminated award of house- hold support pursuant to § 46b-86 (a) because award was nonmodifiable as to duration, amount), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 901 , 762 A.2d 910 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Connecticut Employees Union Independent
Compare, e.g., State v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 2663, AFL-CIO, 59 Conn.App. 793 , 804-806, 758 A.2d 387 (affirming vacatur, on public policy grounds, of award reinstating driver of children committed to custody of Department of Children and Families after his convictions for possession of marijuana and cocaine with intent to sell), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 905 , 762 A.2d 910 (2000) ; Cleveland Board of Education v. International Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers Local 701, 120 Ohio App.3d 63 , 75-76, 696 N.E.2d 658 (1997) (affirming vacatur, on public policy grounds, of award reinstating school …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Connecticut Employees Union Independent
Compare, e.g., State v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 2663, AFL- CIO, 59 Conn. App. 793 , 804–806, 758 A.2d 387 (affirming vacatur, on public policy grounds, of award reinstating driver of children committed to custody of Department of Children and Families after his convictions for pos- session of marijuana and cocaine with intent to sell), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 905 , 762 A.2d 910 (2000); Cleve- land Board of Education v. International Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers Local 701, 120 Ohio App. 3d 63 , 75–76, 696 N.E.2d 658 (1997) (affirming vacatur, on public policy grounds, of award reinstati…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
AFSCME, COUNCIL 4, LOCAL 2663, AFL-CIO
v.
AFSCME, COUNCIL 4, LOCAL 2663, AFL-CIO
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 16, 2000.
J. William Gagne, Jr., in support of the petition., Beth Z. Margulies, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Chancery of Delaware (1)
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 59 Conn. App. 793 (AC 19209), is denied.
PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.