State v. Belton, 774 A.2d 139 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Belton, 774 A.2d 139 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ibrahim v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2024-12-17)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ibrahim v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Ibrahim, 62 Conn. App. 634, 634 , 772 A.2d 680 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 919 , 774 A.2d 139 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" State v. T.R.D.
Conn. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Cohens, 62 Conn. App. 345, 350 , 773 A.2d 363 C‘[t]he first two steps in the Golding analysis address the reviewability of the claim, whereas the last two steps address the merits of the claim”), cert. denied, 256 Conn. 918 , 774 A.2d 139 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" State v. TRD
Conn. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Cohens, 62 Conn. App. 345, 350 , 773 A.2d 363 ("[t]he first two steps in the Golding analysis address the reviewability of the claim, whereas the last two steps address the merits of the claim"), cert. denied, 256 Conn. 918 , 774 A.2d 139 (2001). [18] The defendant claims that §§ 54-251 and 54-257 are unconstitutional absent a requirement of an element of mens rea.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Warholic
Conn. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jeudis, 62 Conn. App. 787, 796 , 772 A.2d 715 (prosecutor’s statement in closing argument that defendant sexually assaulted victim was proper because state first established evidentiary foundation that could lead jury to this factual finding), cert. denied, 256 Conn. 923 , 774 A.2d 140 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Aponte
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jeudis, 62 Conn. App. 787, 793-94 , 772 A.2d 715 (trial court properly denied motion for new trial because record did not support claim that defendant was deprived of fair trial due to prosecutorial misconduct), cert. denied, 256 Conn. 923 , 774 A.2d 140 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Lewis (2×)
Conn. · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Cohens, 62 Conn.App. 345, 355 , 773 A.2d 363 (finding sufficient evidence of intent to sell in proscribed area when officer observed defendant engage in transaction in area known for drug activity), cert. denied, 256 Conn. 918 , 774 A.2d 139 (2001); State v. Knight, 56 Conn.App. 845, 848, 852-53 , 747 A.2d 13 (2000) (finding sufficient evidence of intent to sell in proscribed area when officer asked for "`ten'" and defendant showed officer marijuana and cocaine).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Gaston
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Cohens, 62 Conn. App. 345, 352 , 773 A.2d 363 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 918 , 774 A.2d 139 (2001); State v. Myer, 59 Conn. App. 301, 302 , 756 A.2d 318 (2000); see also State v. Miller, 55 Conn. App. 185, 187-89 , 738 A.2d 1142 (1999) (canvass consisting of whether defendant wanted counsel or wanted to proceed without counsel insufficient to show knowing, intelligent and voluntary waiver).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
DARRYL BELTON
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 30, 2001.
774 A.2d 139
Thomas M. Conroy, in support of the petition., Toni M. Smith-Rosario, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 698 (AC 20656), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE and ZARELLA, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.