Walter v. State, 776 A.2d 1148 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Walter v. State, 776 A.2d 1148 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
64 citation events (64 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Sulser (connappct, 2008-08-26)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Sulser (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lucas, 63 Conn. App. 263, 273 , 775 A.2d 338 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 930 , 776 A.2d 1148 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Aaron L. (2×)
Conn. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
In other words, he does not assert that a reviewing court cannot consider whether it “can [still] sustain the admission of the evidence if other proper grounds exist for admission of the statements].” State v. Williams, 48 Conn. App. 361, 367 , 709 A.2d 43 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 907 , 718 A.2d 16 (1998); see State v. Lucas, 63 Conn. App. 263 , 270 n.7, 775 A.2d 338 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 930 , 776 A.2d 1148 (2001); see also Doe v. Thames Valley Council for Community Action, Inc., 69 Conn. App. 850, 869 , 797 A.2d 1146 (if residual exception properly was applied to statements, then tr…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Bletsch (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lucas, 63 Conn. App. 263, 281 , 775 A.2d 338 (defendant’s claim fails third prong of Golding due to binding Supreme Court precedent), cert. denied, 256 Conn. 930 , 776 A.2d 1148 (2001); State v. Maia, 48 Conn. App. 677, 685 , 712 A.2d 956 (defendant’s claim fails third prong of Golding due to binding Supreme Court, Appellate Court precedent), cert. denied, 245 Conn. 918 , 717 A.2d 236 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Aaron L. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lucas, 63 Conn. App. 263 , 270 n.7, 775 A.2d 338 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 930 , 776 A.2d 1148 (2001); see also Doe v. Thames Valley Council for Community Action, Inc., 69 Conn. App. 850, 869 , 797 A.2d 1146 (if residual exception was properly applied to statements, then court’s improper admission of them under medical treatment exception was harmless), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 906 , 804 A.2d 212 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Dillard (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lucas, 63 Conn. App. 263, 277 , 775 A.2d 338 (individ ual comments not scrutinized in vacuum, but are reviewed in context of entire trial), cert. denied, 256 Conn. 930 , 776 A.2d 1148 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. A. M. (2×)
Conn. · 2017 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Lucas, 63 Conn. App. 263 , 278–79, 775 A.2d 338 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 930 , 776 A.2d 1148 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. A. M. (2×)
Conn. · 2016 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Lucas , 63 Conn.App. 263 , 278-79, 775 A.2d 338 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 930 , 776 A.2d 1148 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rafalko v. University of New Haven
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Our Supreme Court has recognized that “[a] faculty manual that sets forth terms of employment may be considered a binding employment contract.” Craine v. Trinity College, supra, 259 Conn. 655 ; see also Daley v. Wesleyan University, 63 Conn. App. 119, 120 , 772 A.2d 725 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 930 , 776 A.2d 1145 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Franco v. Yale University
D. Conn. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
Bad faith means more than mere negligence; it involves a dishonest purpose.” Habetz v. Condon, 224 Conn. 231, 237 , 618 A.2d 501 (1992) (internal citations and quotations omitted); see also Daley v. Wesleyan University, 63 Conn.App. 119 , 133 n. 18, 772 A.2d 725 (a case involving a faculty member denied tenure), cert. denied, 256 Conn. 930 , 776 A.2d 1145 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Salmond (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Lucas, 63 Conn. App. 263 , 270 n.7, 775 A.2d 338 (“ ‘[w]e can sustain a right decision although it may have been placed on a wrong ground’ ”), cert. denied, 256 Conn. 930 , 776 A.2d 1148 (2001); Biro v. Hirsch, 62 Conn. App. 11 , 16 n.7, 771 A.2d 129 (“[w]e may affirm a proper result of the trial court for a different reason”), cert. denied, 256 Conn. 908 , 772 A.2d 601 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hayes v. Yale-New Haven Hospital
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
That is a proposition that likely is true; see, e.g., Daley v. Wesleyan University, *337 63 Conn. App. 119, 127 , 772 A.2d 725 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 930 , 776 A.2d 1145 (2001); but for which the plaintiff provides no legal support.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CLAUDIA WALTER
v.
STATE OF CONNECTICUT, SERVICES FOR THE BLIND
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 14, 2001.
776 A.2d 1148
Brian W. Prucker, in support of the petition., Philip M. Schulz, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
Published

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 1 (AC 19754), is denied.