Henderson v. Comm'r of Corr., 793 A.2d 1089 (Conn. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Henderson v. Comm'r of Corr., 793 A.2d 1089 (Conn. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (44 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Banks v. Commissioner of Correction (conn, 2023-07-25)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Banks v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
Reviewing claims not raised in the petition for certification to appeal ‘‘would amount to an ambuscade of the [habeas] judge.’’ (Inter- nal quotation marks omitted.) Mitchell v. Commis- sioner of Correction, 68 Conn. App. 1, 7 , 790 A.2d 463 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 903 , 793 A.2d 1089 (2002); see id., 5–7 (declining to review unpreserved claim when petitioner failed to raise it in petition for certification to appeal or application for waiver of fees, costs and expenses and appointment of appellate counsel); see also Foote v. Commissioner of Correction, 151 Conn. App. 559 , 571, 96…
cited Cited "see" Peeler v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mitchell v. Commissioner , 68 Conn.App. 1 , 7, 790 A.2d 463 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 903 , 793 A.2d 1089 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Perillo v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
A review of such claims would amount to an ambuscade of the [habeas] judge.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Campbell v. Commissioner of Correction, 132 Conn. App. 263, 267 , 31 A.3d 1182 (2011); see also Perry v. Commissioner of Correction, 131 Conn. App. 792, 796 , 28 A.3d 1015 (Appellate Court declined to review *62 claim not included in petition for certification to appeal), cert. denied, 303 Conn. 913 , 32 A.3d 966 (2011); Logan v. Commissioner of Correction, 126 Conn. App. 744, 752 , 9 A.3d 776 (2010) (same), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 918 , 14 A.3d 333 (2011); see …
cited Cited "see" Logan v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mitchell v. Commissioner of Correction, 68 Conn. App. 1, 6-7 , 790 A.2d 463 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 903 , 793 A.2d 1089 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Harris v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mitchell v. Commissioner of Correction, 68 Conn. App. 1, 7 , 790 A.2d 463 (“[t]his court is not bound to consider claimed errors unless it appears on the record that the question was distinctly raised . . . and was ruled upon and decided by the court adversely to the appellant’s claim” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 903 , 793 A.2d 1089 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Henderson v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Henderson v. Commissioner of Correction, 260 Conn. 904 , 793 A.2d 1089 (2002).
cited Cited "see" Mitchell v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mitchell v. Commissioner of Correction, 68 Conn. App. 1, 2-3 , 790 A.2d 463 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 903 , 793 A.2d 1089 (2002).
cited Cited "see" Niblack v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mitchell v. Commissioner of Correction, 68 Conn. App. 1, 7-8 , 790 A.2d 463 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 903 , 793 A.2d 1089 (2002).
cited Cited "see" Vines v. WARDEN, STATE PRISON
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mitchell v. Commissioner of Correction, 68 Conn. App. 1 , 2 n.2, 790 A.2d 463 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 903 , 793 A.2d 1089 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ramos v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2026 · signal: see also · confidence low
The court explained that, “in the absence of any stated grounds on which the petitioner proposed to appeal, the habeas court was left to speculate as to what issue or issues the petitioner might have sought to raise on appeal . . . [and] could only guess whether [the peti- tioner] intended to challenge on appeal the court’s denial of the sole claim alleged in his petition . . . or, instead, rulings on evidentiary claims or . . . pretrial motions.” Ramos v. Commissioner of Correction (Emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id.; see also Mitchell v. Commissioner of Correction…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Torres v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Mitchell v. Commissioner of Correction, 68 Conn. App. 1, 8 , 790 A.2d 463 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 903 , 793 A.2d 1089 (2002). 3 See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MITCHELL HENDERSON
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 14, 2002.
793 A.2d 1089
Adam A. Laben, special public defender, in support of the petition., Susan C. Marks, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The petitioner Mitchell Henderson’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 21756) is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.