green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Jacobson
For example, they did not have any direct connection with the crimes charged; but see State v. Springmann, 69 Conn. App. 400, 417 , 794 A.2d 1071 (pornographic videotapes shown to minors “were clearly connected to the crime charged because the presentation of the videotapes was the basis for two counts involving [risk of injury to a child]”), cert, denied, 260 Conn. 934 , 802 A.2d 89 (2002); nor were they sexually explicit.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Allen
See State v. J.R., 69 Conn. App. 767, 771 , 797 A.2d 560 (trial court was in unique position to draw factual impressions from observation of demeanor of counsel and flow of conversation during *579 colloquy after jury left courtroom), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 935 , 802 A.2d 89 (2002); see, e.g., United States v. Beldin, 737 F.2d 450, 455 (5th Cir.) (failure to object to discharge of jury or to request that jury be recalled constituted waiver of right to poll), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1075 , 105 S. Ct. 572 , 83 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Sawyer
See State v. Greene, 69 Conn. App. 463, 471-72 , 794 A.2d 1092 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 934 , 802 A.2d 89 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hoskie
See State v. Greene, 69 Conn. App. 463, 472 , 794 A.2d 1092 (admission of evidence harmless error where prejudicial impact of challenged evidence overshadowed by graphic nature of unchallenged evidence), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 934 , 802 A.2d 89 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spencer v. Spencer
Although it is axiomatic that this court is bound by the decisions of our Supreme Court; see State v. James, 69 Conn. App. 130, 133-34 , 793 A.2d 1200 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 936 , 802 A.2d 89 (2002); those decisions interpreting the laws of our sister states have no relevance in our application of Connecticut law.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Reddick
The parties do not dispute that "[e]vidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts of a person is admissible ... to prove ... an element of the crime. ..." Conn. Code Evid. § 4-5 (c) ; see also, e.g., State v. James , 69 Conn.App. 130 , 135, 793 A.2d 1200 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 936 , 802 A.2d 89 (2002) ; State v. Hanks , 39 Conn.App. 333 , 344, 665 A.2d 102 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 926 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Daniel G.
(2×)
Finally, we note that “[a] statute is not void for vagueness unless it clearly and unequivocally is unconstitutional, making every presumption in favor of its validity.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ward, 306 Conn. 718 , 742, 51 A.3d 970 (2012); see also State v. Springmann, 69 Conn. App. 400, 407 , 794 A.2d 1071 (to prevail in challenge to constitutionality of statute, defendant must demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that statute, as applied, deprived him or her of adequate notice or that he or she fell victim to arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement), cert. denied, 2…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
JOHN SPRINGMANN, JR.
v.
JOHN SPRINGMANN, JR.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 18, 2002.
Cameron Dorman, special public defender, in support of the petition., Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 69 Conn. App. 400 (AC 20316), is denied.