State v. Thompson, 802 A.2d 90 (Conn. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Thompson, 802 A.2d 90 (Conn. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (26 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Beverly (connappct, 2002-09-03)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Beverly (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Thompson, 69 Conn. App. 299, 307 , 797 A.2d 539 , cert. granted on other grounds, 260 Conn. 936 , 802 A.2d 90 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Spencer v. Spencer
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
Although it is axiomatic that this court is bound by the decisions of our Supreme Court; see State v. James, 69 Conn. App. 130, 133-34 , 793 A.2d 1200 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 936 , 802 A.2d 89 (2002); those decisions interpreting the laws of our sister states have no relevance in our application of Connecticut law.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Reddick
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
The parties do not dispute that "[e]vidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts of a person is admissible ... to prove ... an element of the crime. ..." Conn. Code Evid. § 4-5 (c) ; see also, e.g., State v. James , 69 Conn.App. 130 , 135, 793 A.2d 1200 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 936 , 802 A.2d 89 (2002) ; State v. Hanks , 39 Conn.App. 333 , 344, 665 A.2d 102 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 926 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
RYAN THOMPSON
SC 16784.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 18, 2002.
802 A.2d 90
Joy K. Fausey, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition., Moira L. Buckley, assistant public defender, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 69 Conn. App. 299 (AC 21588), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the prosecutor’s three improper remarks in rebuttal argument required reversal of the judgment of conviction?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (a) the trial court improperly permitted one witness to testify as to the credibility of another; and (b) that ruling constituted harmful error?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Joy K. Fausey, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Moira L. Buckley, assistant public defender, in opposition. Decided June 18, 2002