Mun. Funding, LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 815 A.2d 675 (Conn. 2003). · Go Syfert
Mun. Funding, LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 815 A.2d 675 (Conn. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Antwon W. v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2017-05-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Antwon W. v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
That trial courts are accorded broad discretion in controlling the manner and scope of voir dire examinations; see State v. Rios , 74 Conn.App. 110 , 114, 810 A.2d 812 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 945 , 815 A.2d 677 (2003) ; reflects this reality.
cited Cited "see" Zanoni v. Lynch
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dontigney v. Roberts, 73 Conn. App. 709, 710 , 809 A.2d 539 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 944 , 815 A.2d 675 (2003).
cited Cited "see" McHenry v. Nusbaum
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dontigney v. Roberts, 73 Conn. App. 709, 712 , 809 A.2d 539 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 944 , 815 A.2d 675 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. James K.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
The purpose of voir dire is to facilitate [the] intelligent exer- cise of peremptory challenges and to help uncover fac- tors that would dictate disqualification for cause.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Holmes, 334 Conn. 202 , 222–23, 221 A.3d 407 (2019); see also State v. Rios, 74 Conn. App. 110, 114 , 810 A.2d 812 (2002) (discussing constitutional and statutory basis for right to question prospective jurors individually), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 945 , 815 A.2d 677 (2003).
MUNICIPAL FUNDING, LLC
v.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE CITY OF WATERBURY
SC 16934.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 5, 2003.
815 A.2d 675
Elaine M. Skoronski, in support of the petition., Franklin G. Pilicy, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published