green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.9 score
“ur courts have concluded . . . that the provisions of the are not exclusive, and a judgment creditor still may seek recognition of a foreign judgment by way of a common-law action on the judgment”
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.
ur courts have concluded . . . that the provisions of the are not exclusive, and a judgment creditor still may seek recognition of a foreign judgment by way of a common-law action on the judgment
discussed
Cited "see"
Sempey v. Stamford Hospital
See Heim v. California Federal Bank , 78 Conn. App. 351 , 359, 828 A.2d 129 (eschewing traditional standard of review in favor of inquiry into "whether the court had 'statutory or legal authority' to strike" particular count in absence of motion), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 911 , 832 A.2d 70 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Perugini v. Giuliano
See Heim v. California Federal Bank, 78 Conn. App. 351, 367 , 828 A.2d 129 (holding *875 that absolute immunity did not apply to intentional infliction of emotional distress claim where “some of the allegations . . . [were] based on . . . conduct that occurred outside the scope of judicial proceedings”), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 911 , 832 A.2d 70 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Pike
See Johnson v. Chaves, 78 Conn. App. 342, 347 , 826 A.2d 1286 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 911 , 832 A.2d 70 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Moasser v. Becker
See Moasser v. Becker, 78 Conn. App. 305 , 828 A.2d 116 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 910 , 832 A.2d 70 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
LaBow v. Rubin
See Heim v. California Federal Bank, 78 Conn. App. *470 351, 369, 828 A.2d 129 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 911 , 832 A.2d 70 (2003); Beizer v. Goepfert, 28 Conn. App. 693, 702 , 613 A.2d 1336 (“conspiracy to defraud is generally classified as a tort claim”), cert. denied, 224 Conn. 901 , 615 A.2d 1044 (1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 973 , 113 S. Ct. 1416 , 122 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Himmelstein v. Town of Windsor
We take the facts to be those alleged in the [pleading] that has been stricken and we construe the [pleading] in the manner most favorable to sustaining its legal sufficiency.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican, 286 Conn. 548, 552-53 , 944 A.2d 329 (2008); see also Heim v. California Federal Bank, 78 Conn. App. 351, 359 , 828 A.2d 129 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 911 , 832 A.2d 70 (2003); see also Practice Book § 10-39 (a).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Violano v. Fernandez
(2×)
Services, Inc., 268 Conn. 283, 292-93 , 842 A.2d 1124 (2004); see also Heim v. California Federal Bank, 78 Conn.App. 351, 358-59 , 828 A.2d 129 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 911 , 832 A.2d 70 (2003).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Zirinsky v. Zirinsky
See, e.g., Heim v. California Federal Bank, 78 Conn. App. 351 , 828 A.2d 129 , cert, denied, 266 Conn. 911 , 832 A.2d 70 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RICHARD A. HEIM
v.
CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK
v.
CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 18, 2003.
Rodd J. Mantell, in support of the petition., Richard A. Heim, pro se, in opposition.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)
The petition by the defendant Reiner, Reiner and Bendett, P.C., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 78 Conn. App. 351 (AC 23105), is denied.