green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Gomez v. Commissioner of Correction
See Gomez v. Commissioner of Correction , 80 Conn. App. 906 , 836 A.2d 1279 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 917 , 841 A.2d 219 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
LAPOINTE v. Commissioner of Correction
See Henderson v. Commissioner of Correction, 80 Conn. App. 499, 504 , 835 A.2d 1036 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 918 , 841 A.2d 1190 (2004). 6 We note that the petitioner’s failure to file a motion for articulation in the event that a court did not address the merits of his claims normally would preclude our review on the basis of an inadequate record.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tran v. Woodworth
Summary judgment procedure is espe- cially ill-adapted to negligence cases, where, as here, the ultimate issue in contention involves a mixed ques- tion of fact and law, and requires the trier of fact to determine whether the standard of care was met in a specific situation. . . . [T]he conclusion of negligence is necessarily one of fact . . . .’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Michaud v. Gurney, 168 Conn. 431, 434 , 362 A.2d 857 (1975); see also Busque v. Oakwood Farms Sports Center, Inc., 80 Conn. App. 603, 607 , 836 A.2d 463 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 919 , 8…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tran v. Woodworth
Summary judgment procedure is espe- cially ill-adapted to negligence cases, where, as here, the ultimate issue in contention involves a mixed ques- tion of fact and law, and requires the trier of fact to determine whether the standard of care was met in a specific situation. . . . [T]he conclusion of negligence is necessarily one of fact . . . .’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Michaud v. Gurney, 168 Conn. 431, 434 , 362 A.2d 857 (1975); see also Busque v. Oakwood Farms Sports Center, Inc., 80 Conn. App. 603, 607 , 836 A.2d 463 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 919 , 8…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Provident Bank v. Lewitt
This rule of public policy has been repeatedly applied by [our Supreme Court].” (Citation omitted.) Atlas Realty Corp. v. House, 123 Conn. 94, 101 , 192 A. 564 (1937); see also State v. Hickey, 80 Conn. App. 589, 596 , 836 A.2d 457 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 917 , 841 A.2d 1192 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
EMISAEL VAZQUEZ
v.
EMISAEL VAZQUEZ
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 4, 2004.
Martin Zeldis, public defender, in support of the petition., Michele C. Lukban, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 907 (AC 23343), is denied.