green
Positive treatment
7.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Whelan v. Brestelli
See Gagne v. Vaccaro, 80 Conn. App. 436 , 451–54, 835 A.2d 491 (2003) (prejudgment remedy may be sought and ordered postjudgment to protect plaintiff’s interest in judgment during pen- dency of appeal), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 920 , 846 A.2d 881 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
GMAT Legal Title Trust 2014-1, U.S. Bank, National Assn. v. Catale
See Gagne v. Vac- caro, 80 Conn. App. 436 , 451–54, 835 A.2d 491 (2003) (prejudgment remedy may be sought and ordered post- judgment to protect plaintiff’s interest in judgment while awaiting outcome of appeal), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 920 , 846 A.2d 881 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Gagne v. Vaccaro
See Gagne v. Vaccaro, 80 Conn. App. 436, 438-39 , 835 A.2d 491 (2003), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 290 , 846 A.2d 881 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas T. Lonardo, P.C. v. Dichello
During oral argument to this court, however, the defendant conceded both that the plaintiff continued to work on the file after April 1, 2004, because he had greater familiarity with the transaction and that the defendant did not object to the plaintiffs continuing work, even after receiving this invoice. 3 It bears emphasis, however, that the portion of Cole cited by the court related to the justification for remunerating attorney’s fees under a claim of quantum meruit; the cited passage did not involve a breach of contract claim. 4 Although rule 1.5 (b) does not provide an independent caus…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lawson
Thus, the doctrine serves as a dividing line between two closely related factual situations: (1) where two or more acts or forces, one of which was set in motion by the defendant, combine to cause the *242 victim’s injuries, in which case the doctrine will not relieve the defendant of criminal responsibility; and (2) where an act or force intervenes in such a way as to relieve a defendant, whose conduct contributed in fact to the victim’s injuries, from responsibility, in which case the doctrine will apply.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 124-25 ; see State v. Arrington, 81 Con…
cited
Cited "see"
Spencer v. Star Steel Structures, Inc.
See Gagne v. Vaccaro, 80 Conn. App. 436, 451-52 , 835 A.2d 491 (2003), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 920 , 846 A.2d 881 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Russell v. Russell
See Gagne v. Vaccaro, 255 Conn. 390, 401 , 766 A.2d 416 (2001) (“lack of a remedy under the contract is a precondition for recovery based upon unjust enrichment”), on appeal after remand, 80 Conn. App. 436 , 835 A.2d 491 (2003), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 920 , 846 A.2d 881 (2004); 26 S. Williston, Contracts (4th Ed. 2003) § 68:5, p. 58 (“[w]here the plaintiff has no alternative right on an enforceable contract, the basis of the plaintiffs recovery is the unjust enrichment of the defendant”); 66 Am.
discussed
Cited "see"
Detar v. Coast Venture XXVX, Inc.
(2×)
See Gagne v. Vaccaro, 80 Conn. App. 436, 449 , 835 A.2d 491 (2003), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 920 , 846 A.2d 881 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Tadros v. Tripodi
See Gagne v. Vaccaro, 80 Conn. App. 436, 451-54 , 835 A.2d 491 (2003), cert, denied, 268 Conn. 920 , 846 A.2d 881 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paniccia v. Success Village Apartments, Inc.
Whether interest may be awarded depends on whether the money involved is payable . . . and whether the detention of the money is or is not wrongful under the circum- stances.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Sosin v. Sosin, 300 Conn. 205, 229 , 14 A.3d 307 (2011); see also Ceci Bros., Inc. v. Five Twenty-One Corp., 81 Conn. App. 419, 427 , 840 A.2d 578 (‘‘Connecticut case law establishes that prejudgment interest is to be awarded if, in the discretion of the trier of fact, equitable consid- erations deem that it is warranted’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Welsh v. Martinez
Martinez, Jr., for purposes of clarity, we refer to him as the defendant in this opinion. 2 For a more detailed account of the conduct that gave rise to this litigation, see Welsh v. Martinez, supra, 157 Conn. App. 225–34. 3 The defendant did not challenge the propriety of that supplemental award on appeal. 4 On April 23, 2013, the trial court granted the plaintiff’s motion for post- judgment interest and ordered that ‘‘interest at the rate of 3.5 percent per annum is awarded as of December 25, 2012.’’ 5 We note that ‘‘[d]espite the apparent contradiction in terms, a prejudg- m…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Izzarelli v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
DiLieto, 297 Conn. at 153 , 998 A.2d 730 (2010); see also Ceci Bros., Inc. v. Five Twenty-One Corp., 81 Conn.App. 419 , 840 A.2d 578 (App.Ct.), cert denied, 268 Conn. 922 , 846 A.2d 881 (2004) (holding that section 52-192a provides for mandatory imposition of interest at a set rate and affords no allowance for the discretion of the court); Cardenas v. Mixcus, 264 Conn. 314, 321 , 823 A.2d 321 (2003) (“Our courts have consistently held that prejudgment interest is to be awarded by the trial court when a valid offer of judgment is filed by the plaintiff, the offer is rejected by the defendant,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. Dunican
It is primarily designed to forestall any dissipation of assets by the defendant and to bring [those assets] into the custody of the law to be held as security for the satisfaction of such judgment as the plaintiff may recover . . . .” (Emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) Morris v. Cee Dee, LLC, 90 Conn. App. 403, 412 , 877 A.2d 899 , cert. granted on other grounds, 275 Conn. 929 , 883 A.2d 1245 (2005) (appeal withdrawn March 13, 2006); see also Gagne v. Vaccaro, 80 Conn. App. 436, 452 , 835 A.2d 491 (2003), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 920 , 846 A. 2d 881 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
J. WILLIAM GAGNE, JR.
v.
ENRICO VACCARO
v.
ENRICO VACCARO
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 7, 2004.
Enrico Vaccaro, pro se, in support of the petition., P. Jo Anne Burgh, in opposition.
Borden, Palmer.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Corad, 80 Conn. App. 436 (AC 22872), is denied.
BORDEN and PALMER, Js.,did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.