green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Holliday
This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Elsey, 81 Conn. App. 738, 743-44 , 841 A.2d 714 , cert. denied, 269 Conn. 901 , 852 A.2d 733 (2004). “[T]he jury must find every element proven beyond a reasonable doubt in order to find the defendant guilty of the charged offense, [but] each of the basic and inferred facts underlying those conclusions need not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 744.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re A'vion A.
See, e.g., General Statutes § 17a-15 (b) (requiring petitioner to review permanency plan for each child under her care ‘‘at least every six months’’); General Statutes § 17a-110a (a) (‘‘[i]n order to achieve early perma- nency for children, decrease children’s length of stay in foster care, reduce the number of moves children experience in foster care and reduce the amount of time between termination of parental rights and adoption, the [petitioner] shall establish a program for concurrent permanency planning’’); General Statutes § 17a-111a (a) (1) (requiring petitioner to…
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Justice V.
See In re Darien S., 82 Conn. App. 169 , 185 n.17, 842 A.2d 1177 , cert. denied, 269 Conn. 904 , 852 A.2d 733 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Zowie N.
See, e.g., In re Darien S., 82 Conn. App. 169, 175-76 , 842 A.2d 1177 , cert. denied, 269 Conn. 904 , 852 A.2d 733 (2004). 12 April 16, 2010, was the original trial date. 13 The respondent does not contest the court’s finding that termination of the respondent’s parental rights was in the best interest of the child. 14 The respondent also claims that the trial court improperly found that he had abandoned the child and that there was no ongoing parent-child relationship.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Douglas
The jury reasonably could have inferred that the defendant had entered into, and had intended to enter into, an agreement to commit assault in the first degree with his brother and Witherspoon on the basis of the following: (1) the defendant’s association with his brother as a member of the New Haven boys; see, e.g., *207 State v. Wells, supra, 100 Conn. App. 348 (evidence of nature of relationship between alleged coconspirators relevant to issue of existence and object of alleged conspiracy); (2) his prior coordinated activity in acquiring and using a firearm with his brother and Witherspoo…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Coltherst
For such a violation, only the single penalty prescribed by the statute can be imposed.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks *113 omitted.) State v. Arceniega, 73 Conn. App. 288, 302 , 807 A.2d 1028 (2002), on appeal after remand, 84 Conn. App. 326 , 853 A.2d 586 , cert, denied, 271 Conn. 926 , 859 A.2d 581 (2004); see also State v. Elsey, 81 Conn. App. 738, 751 , 841 A.2d 714 , cert, denied, 269 Conn. 901 , 852 A.2d 733 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IN RE DARIEN S.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 12, 2004.
James J. Connolly, supervisory assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Michael Besso, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
Published
The respondent’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 169 (AC 23748), is denied.