green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Sander v. Sander
See Fish v. Igoe, 83 Conn. App. 398 , 405 n.6, 849 A.2d 910 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 921 , 859 A.2d 577 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Housing Authority of New Haven v. Martin
See Kobyluck v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 84 Conn. App. 160, 165 , 852 A.2d 826 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 923 , 859 A.2d 579 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ribeiro v. Fasano, Ippolito & Lee, P.C.
For that reason, the court has held that the curative provision of § 52-72 (a) ‘‘is mandatory rather than directory . . . .’’ (Footnote omitted.) Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax Review, supra, 229 Conn. 626 ; see also Kobyluck v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 84 Conn. App. 160, 168 , 852 A.2d 826 (‘‘[§] 52-72 requires the trial court to allow a proper amendment to defective process’’), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 923 , 859 A.2d 579 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gail DIMMOCK
v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY.
v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 22, 2004.
Published
Francis X. Drapeau, Rockville, in support of the petition.
Constance L. Epstein, Hartford, in opposition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 84 Conn.App. 236, 853 A.2d 543 (2004), is denied.