green
Positive treatment
7.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Kehayias
See State v. Oso- ria, 86 Conn. App. 507, 514 , 861 A.2d 1207 (2004) (‘‘[t]he defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is primarily a challenge to the credibility of [a certain witness’] testimony, which provided a sufficient eviden- tiary basis for the conviction’’), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 910 , 870 A.2d 1082 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ross
(2×)
See State v. Sargent, 87 Conn. App. 24, 40 , 864 A.2d 20 (use of prefatory phrase ‘‘ ‘indicated to you’ ’’ conveyed to jury that prosecutor was recollecting actual testimony from witness), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 912 , 870 A.2d 1082 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
DDS Wireless International, Inc. v. Nutmeg Leasing, Inc.
(2×)
See State v. Sargent, 87 Conn. App. 24, 30 , 864 A.2d 20 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 912 , 870 A.2d 1082 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Vilchel
See State v. Osoria, 86 Conn. App. 507, 516 , 861 A.2d 1207 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 910 , 870 A.2d 1082 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Kerr
See State v. Osoria, 86 Conn. App. 507, 515 , 861 A.2d 1207 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 910 , 870 A.2d 1082 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Smith
See State v. Osoria, 86 Conn. App. 507, 515 , 861 A.2d 1207 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 910 , 870 A.2d 1082 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bazemore
See State v. Osoria, 86 Conn. App. 507, 515 , 861 A.2d 1207 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 910 , 870 A.2d 1082 (2005).
examined
Cited "see"
Small v. Commissioner of Correction
(4×)
See State v. Sargent, 87 Conn. App. 24, 42-44 , 864 A.2d 20 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 912 , 870 A.2d 1082 (2005); see also State v. Maresca, 173 Conn. 450, 460-61 , 377 A.2d 1330 (1977).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Myers
(4×)
General Statutes § 21a-240(50)." [5] (Emphasis *649 added; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Arbelo, 37 Conn.App. 156, 159-60 , 655 A.2d 263 (1995); see also State v. Sargent, 87 Conn.App. 24 , 44 n. 11, 864 A.2d 20 ("[t]his court has observed that the statutory definition of `sale' as applied to illegal drug transactions is much broader than its common definition"), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 912 , 870 A.2d 1082 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Theo SARGENT.
v.
Theo SARGENT.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 2, 2005.
Published
Elizabeth M. Inkster, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
James M. Ralls, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn.App. 24, 864 A.2d 20 (2005), is denied.