green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Miller
See State v. Stavrakis, 88 Conn. App. 371, 389 , 869 A.2d 686 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 939 , 875 A.2d 45 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grady v. Town of Somers
See DeConti v. McGlone, 88 Conn. App. 270, 273-75 , 869 A.2d 271 (plaintiff in case of rotted tree falling on car was not identifiable victim, despite fact that “she lives in close proximity to the tree in question” and “was required to drive on [street where tree fell] as a result of the location of her house” because “[s]he has not shown that her decision to take that particular route was anything but a voluntary decision that was made as a matter of convenience”), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 940 , 875 A.2d 42 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gaskin
See State v. Stavrakis, 88 Conn. App. 371, 374 , 869 A.2d 686 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 939 , 875 A.2d 45 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Rosado
See State v. Stavrakis, 88 Conn. App. 371, 388 , 869 A.2d 686 (trial court “not required to broaden the scope of the jury’s inquiry”), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 939 , 875 A.2d 45 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marvin v. Board of Education
Pierre v. Plainfield, 326 Conn. 420 , 436–37, 165 A.3d 148 (2017); see also DeConti v. McGlone, 88 Conn. App. 270 , 274–75, 869 A.2d 271 (plaintiff injured when tree fell on car while driving not identifiable victim because no requirement for her to drive on portion of roadway where accident occurred), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 940 , 875 A.2d 42 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cator v. Commissioner of Correction
Although similar to DeBarros in that the court in this case read, provided, or referred to the improper instruction a total of ten times, "[a] quantitative 'litmus test' measuring how frequently a trial court gives an irrelevant instruction is ... insufficient to establish an instruction's tendency to mislead the jury." State v. Montanez , supra, 277 Conn. at 746 , 894 A.2d 928 ; see also State v. Santiago , 87 Conn. App. 754 , 764, 867 A.2d 138 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 938 , 875 A.2d 45 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Strycharz v. Cady
(2×)
November 7, 2013) ; see, e.g., Coe v. Board of Education , 301 Conn. 112 , 119, 19 A.3d 640 (2011) (upholding trial court's conclusion that student injured at middle school graduation dance held at off-school site was not member of identifiable class of foreseeable victims because, inter alia, she was not required to be at dance); Durrant v. Board of Education , 284 Conn. 91 , 96, 104, 931 A.2d 859 (2007) (holding that mother, whose six year old child was attending optional after-school day care program conducted in conjunction with public school, was not member of identifiable class of forese…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rodriguez
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Smith, 88 Conn. App. 275, 279 , 869 A.2d 258 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 940 , 875 A.2d 45 (2005); State v. Fauci, 87 Conn. App. 150, 159 , 865 A.2d 1191 , cert. granted on other grounds, 273 Conn. 921 , 871 A.2d 1029 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Gregory SMITH.
v.
Gregory SMITH.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 17, 2005.
Published
William B. Westcott, special public defender, in support of the petition.
Susann E. Gill, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 88 Conn.App. 275, 869 A.2d 258 (2005), is denied.