green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
ACLU of PA, Aplt. v. PA State Police
Attorney of Blair Cty., 880 A.2d at 569 (in camera review of an autopsy report to determine whether release would interfere with an ongoing criminal investigation); Commonwealth v. Natividad, 200 A.3d 11 (Pa. 2019) (in camera review of drug use and mental health records to determine whether disclosure would invade witness’s privacy); Octave ex rel.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Penn Jersey Advance, Inc. v. Grim
The Court observed that “[t]his interpretation is certainly reasonable, as the phrase ‘official records and papers’’is broadly stated ... and the parties do not dispute that autopsy reports are covered material.” Buchanan II, 583 Pa. at 624 , 880 A.2d at 571 (emphasis added) (citation omitted).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Koken v. Reliance Insurance
Attorney of Blair County, 583 Pa. 620 , 880 A.2d 568, 570 (2005); Siekierda v. Commonwealth, Dept. of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 580 Pa. 259 , 860 A.2d 76, 81 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Larry Lee FOSTER
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
Published
ORDER
PER CURIAM.AND NOW, this 15th day of August, 2005, the decision of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED. See Alexander v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, — Pa. -, 880 A.2d 552 (2005), J-167-2004.