Danysh v. Dep't of Corr., 881 A.2d 1263 (Pa. 2005). · Go Syfert
Danysh v. Dep't of Corr., 881 A.2d 1263 (Pa. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (28 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Borough of Coraopolis v. A. Papa (pacommwct, 2023-03-03)
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012 2019 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Borough of Coraopolis v. A. Papa
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Amanda Lynn Wasserman (Pa. Super., No. 1407 WDA 2019, filed Nov. 12, 2021), appeal denied, 275 A.3d 487 (Pa. 2022). 3 While examining Ms. Papa’s claims, we are mindful of the rule that “allegations of a pro se complainant are held to a less stringent standard than that applied to pleadings filed by attorneys.” Rosario v. Beard, 920 A.2d 931, 934 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2007) (quoting Danysh v. Dep’t of Corr., 845 A.2d 260, 262-63 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2004), aff’d, 881 A.2d 1263 (Pa. 2005)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Johnson, A., Aplt. v. Wetzel, J.
Pa. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Danysh v. Dep’t of Corr., 845 A.2d 260, 262-63 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2004) (en banc) (“The allegations of a pro se complainant are held to a less stringent standard than that applied to pleadings filed by attorneys.”), aff’d, 881 A.2d 1263 (2005); Dep’t of Corr. v. Tate, 133 A.3d 350 , 354 n.8 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2016) (same). [J-99-2020] [MO: Saylor, C.J.] - 5 pleaded a viable negligence claim, I proceed to examine DOC’s assertions that the claim nonetheless should be dismissed because of qualified immunity and the statute of limitations.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kurt Michael DANYSH
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Cindy Walsavage, Inmate Accounting Assistant I Robert Shannon, Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Frackville
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 28, 2005.
881 A.2d 1263
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2005, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.