Weldy v. Northbrook Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 883 A.2d 1253 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Weldy v. Northbrook Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 883 A.2d 1253 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (24 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Vivo v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2025-06-03)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Vivo v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Dance Right, LLC
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wakefield v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 90 Conn. App. 441, 443 , 877 A.2d 1 (remand pursuant to § 4-183 (h) permits party to present additional evidence before agency upon demonstration ‘‘that the additional evidence is material and that there are good reasons for the failure to present it in the Page 18 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL 0, 0 20 ,0 0 Conn. App. 1 Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Dance Right, LLC proceeding before the agency’’), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 931 , 883 A.2d 1253 (2005).
cited Cited "see" State v. Vivo
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vivo v. Commissioner of Correction, 90 Conn. App. 167, 177 , 876 A.2d 1216 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 925 , 883 A.2d 1253 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Samuel (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vivo v. Commissioner of Correction, 90 Conn. App. 167, 177 , 876 A.2d 1216 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 925 , 883 A.2d 1253 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas P. Weldy Et Al.
v.
Northbrook Condominium Association, Inc., Et Al.
SC 17503.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 2005.
883 A.2d 1253
Ari J. Hoffman, in support of the petition., Thomas P. Weldy, pro se, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn. App. 581 (AC 25465), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly limit the extent to which a condominium’s board of directors is empowered to adopt rules and regulations?”