In re Hummel, 886 A.2d 222 (Pa. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Hummel, 886 A.2d 222 (Pa. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: T. Martin v. The Sec'y. of the DOC (pacommwct, 2023-09-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" T. Martin v. The Sec'y. of the DOC
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Spotz [v. Commonwealth, 972 A.2d 125, 131 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2009)] (“Even though the [Form DC-300B] was completed on the 5 court’s behalf by the clerk and was not signed by the sentencing judge, [DOC] did not err in relying on that form[.]”) (quoting Boyd [v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, 831 A.2d 779 , 783 n.6 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2003), aff’d, 886 A.2d 222 (Pa. 2005)]).
cited Cited "see" Richardson v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Boyd v. Dep’t of Corr., 831 A.2d 779 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003), aff'd, 584 Pa. 540 , 886 A.2d 222 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Evans v. Beard
E.D. Pa. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Boyd v. Pa. Dep’t of Corr., 831 A.2d 779 , 783 n. 6 (Pa. Cmwlth.2003), aff'd, 584 Pa. 540 , 886 A.2d 222 (2005) ("Even though the Court Commitment order, Form DC-300B, was completed on the court’s behalf by the clerk and was not signed by the sentencing judge, the Department did not err in relying on that form which indicated that Boyd had been ordered to pay” fines, costs and restitution.). 4 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." M. Morgalo v. S. Gorniak (SCI Albion Accountant) v. Montgomery County Clerk of Courts
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Heffran v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 863 A.2d 1260, 1263 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004) aff'd, 584 Pa. 540 , 886 A.2d 222 (2005) (holding that an inmate was not an employee with standing to file a complaint for violations of the Worker and Community Right-to-Know Act, Act of October 5, 1984, P.L. 734, 35 P.S. §§ 7301-7320). 17 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Petition of Charlotte K. HUMMEL to Establish Identity by Candidate Nominated Under Different Names and Cumulate Votes and Amended Petition to Establish Identity by Candidate Nominated Under Different Names and Cumulate Votes Petition of Charlotte K. Hummel
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct 14, 2005.
886 A.2d 222
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED based on 25 P.S. § 8157(a), and this case is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas for a hearing on the merits. The trial court is instructed to cumulate such write-in ballots cast in the primary election as are in accordance with 25 P.S §§ 3062, 3063, 3155, Appeal of McCracken, 370 Pa. 562, 88 A.2d 787 (1952), and Dayhoff v. Weaver, 808 A.2d 1002, 1011 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002). Jurisdiction relinquished.