green
Positive treatment
Trending · 113 recent citers
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2014–2015 ·
…objections to the discretionary aspects of a sentence are generally waived if they are not raised at the sentencing hearing or raised in a motion to modify the sentence imposed at that hearing.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Com. v. Poston, J.
objections to the discretionary aspects of a sentence are generally waived if they are not raised at the sentencing hearing or raised in a motion to modify the sentence imposed at that hearing.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Com. v. Hickman, R.
objections to the discretionary aspects of a sentence are generally waived if they are not raised at the sentencing hearing or raised in a motion to modify the sentence imposed at that hearing.
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Carney, D.
See Commonwealth v. Hyland, 875 A.2d 1175, 1190 (Pa.Super. 2005), appeal denied, 586 Pa. 723 , 890 A.2d 1057 (2005) (explaining defendant is “unavailable” for trial if delay in commencement of trial is caused by filing of pretrial motion).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Jones, K.
See generally Commonwealth v. Menezes, 871 A.2d 204, 209 (Pa. Super. 2005), appeal denied, 890 A.2d 1057 (Pa. 2005). [T]he rape shield laws, as enacted by the various states, “were intended to end the abuses fostered by the common law rule by limiting the harassing and embarrassing inquiries of defense counsel into irrelevant prior sexual conduct of sexual assault complainants.” Commonwealth v. Nieves, 582 A.2d 341, 346 (Pa. 1990), appeal denied, 600 A.2d 952 (Pa. 1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Carr, S.
See Commonwealth v. Hyland, 875 A.2d 1175 (Pa.Super. 2005), appeal denied, 586 Pa. 723 , 890 A.2d 1057 (2005) (stating claim that sentencing court failed to consider mitigating factors challenges discretionary aspects of sentencing); Commonwealth v. Lutes, 793 A.2d 949 (Pa.Super. 2002) (stating claim that sentence is manifestly excessive challenges discretionary aspects of sentencing); Commonwealth v. Davis, 737 A.2d 792 (Pa.Super. 1999) (stating claim that court imposed sentence outside of guidelines without placing sufficient explanation on record implicates discretionary aspects of sentenci…
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Hardy, J.
See Commonwealth v. Little, 879 A.2d 293, 301 (Pa. Super. 2005), appeal denied, 890 A2d 1057 (Pa. 2005) (“An (Footnote Continued Next Page) J-S56040-15 On October 6, 2013, at approximately 7:30 p.m., Officer [Thomas] Cole of the Lancaster City Police Department responded to a domestic dispute in the 600 block of South Lime Street in the City and County of Lancaster.
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Dunbar, C.
See generally Commonwealth v. Menezes, 871 A.2d 204, 209 (Pa. Super. 2005), appeal denied, 586 Pa. 724 , 890 A.2d 1057 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Cesaire, T.
See Commonwealth v. Menezes, 871 A.2d 204, 207-08 (Pa. Super. 2005), appeal denied, 890 A.2d 1057 (Pa. 2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Mays, J.
See id. -9- J-S69002-14 Our standard of review concerning the discretionary aspects of sentencing is as follows: Sentencing is a matter vested in the sound discretion of the sentencing judge, and a sentence will not be disturbed on appeal absent a manifest abuse of discretion.
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Weltmer, T.
See Commonwealth v. Hyland, 875 A.2d 1175, 1183 (Pa.Super. 2005), appeal denied, 890 A.2d 1057 (2005) (indicating substantial question presented when issue raises question of whether trial court sentenced in aggravated range without considering mitigating circumstances).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Burns
See generally Commonwealth v. Menezes, 871 A.2d 204, 209 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, 586 Pa. 724 , 890 A.2d 1057 (2005).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Muhammad, M.
See also Commonwealth v. Little, 879 A.2d 293, 300-301 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, 586 Pa. 724 , 890 A.2d 1057 (2005); Commonwealth v. Washington, 825 A.2d 1264, 1265 (Pa.Super.2003).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Muhammad, M.
See also Commonwealth v. Little, 879 A.2d 293, 300-301 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, 586 Pa. 724 , 890 A.2d 1057 (2005); Commonwealth v. Washington, 825 A.2d 1264, 1265 (Pa.Super2003).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Pham, C.
See also Commonwealth v. Little, 879 A.2d 293, 300-301 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, 586 Pa. 724 , 890 A.2d 1057 (2005); Commonwealth v. Washington, 825 A.2d 1264, 1265 (Pa.Super.2003).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Reese
See also Commonwealth v. Hyland, 875 A.2d 1175, 1186 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, 586 Pa. 723 , 890 A.2d 1057 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Ab
See also Commonwealth v. Menezes, 871 A.2d 204, 209 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, 586 Pa. 724 , 890 A.2d 1057 (2005); Commonwealth v. Reaser, 851 A.2d 144, 148 (Pa.Super.2004), appeal denied, 581 Pa. 674 , 863 A.2d 1145 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Interest of A.B.
See also Commonwealth v. Menezes, 871 A.2d 204, 209 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, 586 Pa. 724 , 890 A.2d 1057 (2005); Commonwealth v. Reaser, 851 A.2d 144, 148 (Pa.Super.2004), appeal denied, 581 Pa. 674 , 863 A.2d 1145 (2004).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Sherwood
See also Commonwealth v. Little, 879 A.2d 293, 300-301 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, 586 Pa. 724 , 890 A.2d 1057 (2005); Commonwealth v. Washington, 825 A.2d 1264, 1265 (Pa.Super.2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COM.
v.
MENEZES
v.
MENEZES
168 EAL (2005).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec 7, 2005.
890 A.2d 1057
Published
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (2)
Disposition of petition for allowance of appeals. Denied.