State v. Samuel, 899 A.2d 39 (Conn. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Samuel, 899 A.2d 39 (Conn. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
72 citation events (72 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. CLAUDIO C. (connappct, 2010-12-21)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" State v. CLAUDIO C.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Stepney, 94 Conn. App. 72, 79 , 891 A.2d 67 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 911 , 899 A.2d 40 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Davis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
Because the record does not reflect either that the defendant sought to conduct further cross-examination of the victim after Miller testified or that the court in any way restricted the defendant’s rights to cross-examine the victim; see State v. Stepney, 94 Conn. App. 72 , 79 n.2, *197 891 A.2d 67 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 911 , 899 A.2d 40 (2006); we conclude that his claim must fail under the third prong of Golding .
cited Cited "see" State v. Gonzalez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Stepney, 94 Conn. App. 72, 78 , 891 A.2d 67 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 911 , 899 A.2d 40 (2006).
cited Cited "see" State v. Cromety
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Stepney, 94 Conn. App. 72, 76-79 , 891 A.2d 67 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 911 , 899 A.2d 40 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Singer
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bermudez, 93 Conn. App. 814, 816 , 890 A.2d 584 , cert. granted on other grounds, 278 Conn. 910 , 899 A.2d 39 (2006). 1 *849 Consequently, we conclude that the defendant’s claims on appeal are not moot.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Ampero
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Stepney, 94 Conn. App. 72, 79, 891 A.2d 67 (“[t]he defendant can not raise a constitutional claim by attaching a constitutional label to a purely evidentiary claim or by asserting merely that a strained connection exists between the evidentiary claim and a fundamental constitutional right”), cert. denied, 278 Conn. 911 , 899 A.2d 40 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Ragin
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 917 (1968); see also Barlow v. Lopes, 201 Conn. 103, 112 , 513 A.2d 132 (1986) (‘[i]t is well established that since collateral legal disabilities are imposed as a matter of law because of a criminal conviction, a case will not be declared moot even where the sentence has been fully served’); State v. Falcon, 84 Conn. App. 429 , 431 n.3, 853 A.2d 607 (2004) (same); see also State v. Scott, 83 Conn. App. 724, 727 , 851 A.2d 353 (2004) (same).” State v. Briggs, 94 Conn. App. 722 , 725 n.4, 894 A.2d 1008 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 912 , 899 A.2d 39 (2006). 2 We note that despite the d…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Lamont V. SAMUEL.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 16, 2006.
899 A.2d 39
Published

Jane E. Carroll, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

[*40] The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn.App. 715, 894 A.2d 363 (2006), is denied.