green
Positive treatment
12.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Lopez v. Commissioner of Correction
See Vines v. Commissioner of Correction, 94 Conn. App. 288 , 293–94, 892 A.2d 312 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 922 , 901 A.2d 1222 (2006). 0, 0 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 21 0 Conn. App. 1 ,0 23 Lopez v. Commissioner of Correction have performed deficiently when she failed to conduct any investigation into a family member witness—Jor- dan v. Commissioner of Correction, supra, 341 Conn. 279—is, in our view, distinguishable from the present case.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Acampora
See State v. Caracoglia , 95 Conn.App. 95 , 113, 895 A.2d 810 ("[i]n general, a trial court may appropriately presume that defense counsel has explained the nature of the offense in sufficient detail" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 278 Conn. 922 , 901 A.2d 1222 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Burgos
United States v. Vamos , 797 F.2d 1146 , 1150 (2d Cir. 1986) ("failure to conduct a full competency hearing is not a ground for reversal when the defendant appears competent during trial"); see State v. Caracoglia , 95 Conn.App. 95 , 108-109, 895 A.2d 810 (holding that defendant was competent to waive right to assistance of counsel because his conduct at trial indicated that he was, in fact, competent to stand trial), cert. denied, 278 Conn. 922 , 901 A.2d 1222 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hodkoski
(2×)
See State v. Windley, 95 Conn. App. 62, 67 , 895 A.2d 270 (concluding that “the court reasonably could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was a third time offender” even though “not all of the court documents pertaining to those convictions bore Ms social security number” because there were “numerous indicators that the defendant was the same person who had been [previously] convicted”), cert. denied, 278 Conn. 924 , 901 A.2d 1222 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
STEPHEN S. v. Commissioner of Correction
See Vines v. Commissioner of Correction, 94 Conn. App. 288, 296-97 , 892 A.2d 312 (court fopnd there was “sufficient tactical basis” for counsel’s decision not to call witness when counsel determined that testimony would not benefit petitioner), cert. denied, 278 Conn. 922 , 901 A.2d 1222 (2006); Chace v. Bronson, 19 Conn. App. 674, 681 , 564 A.2d 303 (court determined that trial counsel’s decision not to present eyewitness testimony was within “range of reasonable trial tactics” when “any benefit that might have inured to the petitioner from [the] testimony would be outweighed b…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Wilson
(2×)
See State v. Windley, 95 Conn. *564 App. 62, 66-67, 895 A.2d 270 (evidence sufficient to establish defendant operating motor vehicle under influence of intoxicating liquor when officer testified defendant’s speech slurred, breath smelled of alcohol and defendant stated he had been drinking), cert. denied, 278 Conn. 924 , 901 A.2d 1222 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bereis
(2×)
See State v. Windley, 95 Conn. App. 62, 66-67 , 895 A.2d 270 (evidence sufficient to establish defendant operating motor vehicle under influence of intoxicating liquor when officer testified defendant’s speech slurred, breath smelled of alcohol and defendant stated he had been drinking), cert. denied, 278 Conn. 924 , 901 A.2d 1222 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
Kearney v. Commissioner of Correction
See Vines v. Commissioner of Correction, 94 Conn. App. 288, 294 , 892 A.2d 312 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 922 , 901 A. 2d 1222 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Darrow
See State v. Carocoglia, 95 Conn. App. 95, 129 , 895 A.2d 810 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 922 , 901 A.2d 1222 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ayuso
See State v. Carocoglia, 95 Conn. App. 95, 129 , 895 A.2d 810 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 922 , 901 A.2d 1222 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Schultz
See State v. Caracoglia, 95 Conn. App. 95, 129 , 895 A.2d 810 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 922 , 901 A.2d 1222 (2006). 12 General Statutes § 53a-35a provides in relevant part: “For any felony committed on or after July 1, 1981, the sentence of imprisonment shall be a definite sentence and the term shall be fixed by the court as follows . . . (4) for the class B felony of manslaughter in the first degree with a firearm under section 53a-55a, a temr not less than five years nor more than forty years; (5) for a class B felony other than manslaughter in the first degree with a firearm under sectio…
cited
Cited "see"
Mejia v. Commissioner of Correction
See Vines v. Commissioner of Correction, 94 Conn. App. 288, 294 , 892 A.2d 312 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 922 , 901 A.2d 1222 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ocasio
See, e.g., State v. Caracoglia, 95 Conn. App. 95, 128 , 895 A.2d 810 (“[t]he testimony of one credible witness is sufficient evidence to convict one accused of a crime”), cert. denied, 278 Conn. 922 , 901 A.2d 1222 (2006). 7 Bolstering this testimony were three additional witnesses, including Alicea, who testified that they saw the defendant with a gun immediately before or after the shooting and heard no more than three shots fired. 8 The jury also heard testimony regarding the defendant’s potential motive to shoot Alicea, including the prior physical altercation and the defendant’s t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. T.R.D.
See, e.g., State v. Caracoglia, 95 Conn. App. 95, 113 , 895 A.2d 810 (“[i]n general, a trial court may appropriately presume that defense counsel has explained the nature of the offense in sufficient detail” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 278 Conn. 922 , 901 A.2d 1222 (2006); see also State v. Wolff, 237 Conn. 633, 658-59 , 678 A.2d 1369 (1996) (relying on fact that defendant was represented by counsel for four months during proceedings in concluding that the “record is sufficient to support the presumption that the defendant’s counsel . . . had explained to him the…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. TRD
See, e.g., State v. Caracoglia, 95 Conn.App. 95, 113 , 895 A.2d 810 ("[i]n general, a trial court may appropriately presume that defense counsel has explained the nature of the offense in sufficient detail" [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 278 Conn. 922 , 901 A.2d 1222 (2006); see also State v. Wolff, 237 Conn. 633, 658-59 , 678 A.2d 1369 (1996) (relying on fact that defendant was represented by counsel for four months during proceedings in concluding that the "record is sufficient to support the presumption that the defendant's counsel . . . had explained to him the nature o…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Floyd A. WINDLEY.
v.
Floyd A. WINDLEY.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 14, 2006.
Published
Michael S. Hillis, New Haven, in support of the petition.
Joan K. Willin, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 95 Conn.App. 62, 895 A.2d 270 (2006), is denied.