green
Positive treatment
10.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Com. v. Brown, J.
“The trial court abuses its discretion if it misapplies the law or [rules] in a manner lacking reason.” Id. at 967 (internal quotation marks omitted). “[T]he disclosure of a confidential surveillance site is governed by Rule -4- J-S66005-18 [573(B)(2)] of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure.” Commonwealth v. Rodriquez, 543 Pa. 651, 658 , 674 A.2d 225, 229 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Hill, M.
See Commonwealth v. Dommel, 885 A.2d 998 (Pa. Super. 2005) (combined circumstances created an exigency which ____________________________________________ 10 It merits mention that on appeal, Hill does not raise a suppression argument, challenging the court’s finding of probable cause. - 15 - J-A06010-19 justified the warrantless entry into a residence to arrest a defendant suspected of committing a DUI offense), appeal denied, 920 A.2d 831 (Pa. 2007); Commonwealth v. Fickes, 969 A.2d 1251 (Pa. Super. 2009) (warrantless entry into garage was permitted where police officer, who was in fresh pu…
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Alwan, Y.
See Commonwealth v. Einhorn, 911 A.2d 960, 970 (Pa.Super. 2006), appeal denied, 920 A.2d 831 (Pa. 2007); see also Pa.R.A.P. 2119(c).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Reyes, E.
See Commonwealth v. Einhorn, 911 A.2d 960, 978 (Pa.Super. 2006), appeal denied, 591 Pa. 723 , 920 A.2d 831 (2007) (holding exact date of offense is unnecessary to provide sufficient notice, where date is not essential element of offense).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Moyer, B.
See Commonwealth v. Einhorn, 911 A.2d 960, 970 (Pa.Super. 2006), appeal denied, 920 A.2d 831 (Pa. 2007) (concluding that arguments which are undeveloped and lack citation to factual background or the certified record are waived); see also Pa.R.A.P. 2119(c), (d).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Santiago, J.
See Commonwealth v. Einhorn, 911 A.2d 960, 970 (Pa. Super. 2006) (“This Court will not become the counsel for an appellant, ‘and will not, therefore, consider issues ... which are not fully developed in [the] brief.’”) (citation omitted), appeal denied, 920 A.2d 831 (Pa. 2007).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Selvey, J.
See Commonwealth v. Dommel, 885 A.2d 998, 1001 (Pa. Super. 2005), appeal denied, 920 A.2d 831 (Pa. 2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Arrington
See Commonwealth v. Einhorn, 911 A.2d 960 (Pa.Super.2006), appeal denied, 591 Pa. 723 , 920 A.2d 831 (2007) (evidence that accused murderer attacked two former girlfriends was admissible to show common scheme where each victim was choked or attacked with a blunt object when the defendant could not persuade the victim to continue the relationship, and the defendant contemporaneously described each incident in his diary); Commonwealth v. Miller, supra (evidence of prior rape and attempted murder was properly admitted to prove common scheme because the incident bore many similarities to subsequen…
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Fransen
See Commonwealth v. Einhorn, 911 A.2d 960, 970 (Pa.Super.2006) (concluding, inter alia, that a claim was waived for failure to direct this Court's attention to that part of the record substantiating his claim), appeal denied, 591 Pa. 723 , 920 A.2d 831 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Benney, R.
See Collins, 957 A.2d at 251 ; see also Commonwealth v. Einhorn, 911 A.2d 960, 970 (Pa.Super. 2006), appeal denied, 920 A.2d 831 (Pa. 2007) (concluding that arguments which are undeveloped and lack citation to factual background or the certified record are waived).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Whittaker, J.
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Dommel, 885 A.2d 998 , 1004 -1005 (Pa. Super. 2005), appeal denied, 920 A.2d 831 (Pa. 2007) (reversing suppression; even though appellant not charged with violent offenses, his actions in hit-and-run incident indicated either callous disregard of, or inability to regard at all, both violent automobile collision which he caused and subsequent official commands to stop.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Lee
Id. at 298-99 , 87 S.Ct. 1642 ; see also Commonwealth v. Dommel, 885 A.2d 998, 1005 (Pa.Super.2005) (where police followed a DUI suspect to his home and saw him enter the house, “hot pursuit” exception permitted immediate entry to arrest him), appeal denied, 591 Pa. 722 , 920 A.2d 831 (2007); Commonwealth v. Grundy, 859 A.2d 485, 488-89 (Pa.Super.2004) (police permitted to enter a “chop shop” immediately because “[i]f the police had taken the time to first seek a warrant, the Nissan would have been in parts and junk by the time they got back”). ¶ 13 No such exigent circumstances e…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COM.
v.
DORSEY[12].
v.
DORSEY[12].
557 WAL (2006).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Apr 3, 2007.
920 A.2d 831
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.
12 Justice FITZGERALD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.