State v. Moore, 934 A.2d 243 (Conn. 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Moore, 934 A.2d 243 (Conn. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case · …mjerely using the term 'recklessness' to describe conduct previously alleged as negligence is insufficient as a matter of law ⚠ not in text
48 citation events (48 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Shaw v. Freeman (connappct, 2012-03-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Shaw v. Freeman (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
mjerely using the term 'recklessness' to describe conduct previously alleged as negligence is insufficient as a matter of law
discussed Cited "see" Maselli v. Regional School District No. 10
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
It has been said that ‘‘[m]erely using the term ‘recklessness’ to describe conduct previously alleged as negligence is insufficient as a matter of law.’’ Angiolillo v. Buck- miller, 102 Conn. App. 697, 705 , 927 A.2d 312 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 927 , 934 A.2d 243 (2007); see id. (affirming summary judgment where plaintiffs’ ‘‘simply incorporated their allegations of negligence and labeled the conduct recklessness’’).
examined Cited "see" In Re Matthew F. (4×)
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Angiolillo v. Buckmiller, 102 Conn. App. 697, 713 , 927 A.2d 312 (“[i]f a court has never acquired jurisdiction over a defendant or the subject matter . . . any judgment ultimately entered is void and subject to vacation or collateral attack” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 927 , 934 A.2d 243 (2007).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hall v. Bergman (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Angiolillo v. Buckmiller, 102 Conn. App. 697, 711 , 927 A.2d 312 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 927 , 934 A.2d 243 (2007).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Dan L. Moore
SC 17992.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 16, 2007.
934 A.2d 243
James A. Killen, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition., Pamela S. Nagy, special public defender, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 64%
Citer courts: Connecticut Appellate Court (2)

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn. App. 1 (AC 26736), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to strike the state’s redirect examination of a witness, and, if so, was the impropriety harmless error?”

[*928] Decided October 16, 2007 Pamela S. Nagy, special public defender, in opposition.