Embalmers'supply Co. v. Giannitti, 934 A.2d 246 (Conn. 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
Embalmers'supply Co. v. Giannitti, 934 A.2d 246 (Conn. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
87 citation events (87 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hassiem v. O and G Industries, Inc. (connappct, 2020-06-02)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Hassiem v. O and G Industries, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See id., 781–82 n.7. 4 ‘‘With respect to decisions made to cut corners as to safety in order to save time or money, the New Jersey Supreme Court considers a profit motive of only limited relevance, applicable only to critique an employer’s long- term choice specifically to sacrifice employee safety for product-production efficiency.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Lucenti v. Laviero, supra, 327 Conn. 782–83. 5 See also Martinez v. Southington Metal Fabricating Co., 101 Conn. App. 796, 798 , 806–807, 924 A.2d 150 (testimony that employee’s arm was crushed while positioni…
cited Cited "see" Sin Hang Lee v. Brenner, Saltzman & Wallman, LLP
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bagoly v. Riccio, 102 Conn. App. 792, 798 , 927 A.2d 950 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 931 , 934 A. 2d 245 (2007).
discussed Cited "see" Natarajan v. Natarajan (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Embalmers’Supply Co. v. Giannitti, 103 Conn. App. 20, 58 , 929 A.2d 729 (evidentiary rulings overturned on appeal only when there was abuse of discretion and showing by defendant of substantial prejudice or iqjustice), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 931 , 934 A.2d 246 (2007); see also Holley v. Holley, supra, 194 Conn. 29 (“[w]ith respect to the financial awards in a dissolution action, great weight is given to the judgment of the trial court because of its opportunity to observe the parties and the evidence” [internal quotation marks omitted]).
examined Cited "see" State v. Williams (4×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Embalmers' Supply Co. v. Giannitti, 103 Conn.App. 20, 61 , 929 A.2d 729 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 931 , 934 A.2d 246 (2007). [2] The motions to dismiss were denied by Judge Norko after he had recused himself in this matter.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dorfman v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
Significantly, our Supreme Court has stated repeat- edly that ‘‘[a] statutory action for vexatious litigation under . . . § 52-568 . . . differs from a common-law action only in that a finding of malice is not an essential element, but will serve as a basis for higher damages.’’ (Citation omitted; emphasis added.) Falls Church Group, Ltd. v. Tyler, Cooper & Alcorn, LLP, supra, 281 Conn. 94 ; see also Bernhard-Thomas Building Sys- tems, LLC v. Dunican, supra, 286 Conn. 554 ; DeLaurentis v. New Haven, supra, 220 Conn. 256 ; Christian v. Iyer, 221 Conn. App. 869 , 877, 303 A.3d 604 (2023…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Colon v. State (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Embalmers’ Supply Co. v. Giannitti, 103 Conn. App. 20, 29-30 , 929 A.2d 729 (trial court denied motion requesting dismissal of case because plaintiffs amended complaint did not comply with pleading requirements of § 52-91 and Practice Book § 10-20), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 931 , 934 A.2d 246 (2007).
examined Cited "see, e.g." State v. Dixon (4×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Embalmers' Supply Co. v. Giannitti, 103 Conn.App. 20, 60-61 , 929 A.2d 729 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 931 , 934 A.2d 246 (2007). [4] Practice Book § 43-10 provides in relevant part: "Before imposing a sentence ... after the acceptance of a plea of guilty ... the judicial authority shall, upon the date previously determined for sentencing, conduct a sentencing hearing as follows: "(1) The judicial authority shall afford the parties an opportunity to be heard and, in its discretion, to present evidence on any matter relevant to the disposition, and to explain or controvert the present…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hall v. Bergman (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Embalmers’ Supply Co. v. Giannitti, 103 Conn. App. 20, 61 , 929 A.2d 729 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 931 , 934 A.2d 246 (2007).
EMBALMERS' SUPPLY COMPANY
v.
Salvatore D. GIANNITTI et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 30, 2007.
934 A.2d 246
Published

Anthony M. Modugno, in support of the petition.

Louis Ciccarello, Norwalk, in opposition.

The petition by the defendant Modugno, Modugno & Modugno, LLC, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn.App. 20, 929 A.2d 729 (2007), is denied.