green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Burr v. Grossman Chevrolet-Nissan, Inc.
See Wieselman v. Hoeniger, 103 Conn. App. 591 , 595 n.7, 930 A.2d 768 (‘‘[i]n common-law fraud cases, the plaintiff has the burden of proving fraud by clear and convincing evi- dence’’), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 930 , 934 A.2d 245 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
See Dept. of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information Commission , 103 Conn.App. 571 , 582 n.10, 930 A.2d 739 ("[i]t is axiomatic that an appellate decision stands only for those issues presented to, and considered by, the court in that particular appeal"), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 930 , 934 A.2d 245 (2007). *104 We also are not persuaded by Vanderbilt's argument that our Supreme Court adopted the continuous trigger theory in Netherlands .
cited
Cited "see"
Locals 2863, 3042, 1303-052 & 1303-115, Council 4, AFSCME v. Town of Hamden
See Dept. of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information Commission, 103 Conn. App. 571, 576 , 930 A.2d 739 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 930 , 934 A.2d 245 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
Sin Hang Lee v. Brenner, Saltzman & Wallman, LLP
See Bagoly v. Riccio, 102 Conn. App. 792, 798 , 927 A.2d 950 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 931 , 934 A. 2d 245 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McLeod v. A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc.
This middle tier standard has been described as 'clear and satisfactory evidence' and as 'clear, precise and unequivocal evidence.' " (Footnote omitted.) Kilduff v. Adams, Inc. , 219 Conn. 314 , 327-28, 593 A.2d 478 (1991) ; see also Wieselman v. Hoeniger , 103 Conn.App. 591 , 595 n.7, 930 A.2d 768 (2007) (describing burden of proof in common-law fraud cases as requiring "clear and convincing evidence"), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 930 , 934 A.2d 245 (2007). *450 "Fraud and misrepresentation cannot be easily defined because they can be accomplished in so many different ways.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Henrry P. B.-P.
See Connecti- cut Coalition Against Millstone v. Rocque, 267 Conn. 116 , 126–27, 836 A.2d 414 (2003) (case is moot when [i]ntervening circumstances have changed the legal landscape . . . and the court cannot grant the [peti- tioner] any practical relief); see also Dept. of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information Commission, 103 Conn. App. 571, 589 , 930 A.2d 739 (because Freedom of Information Commission lacks statutory authority to issue final decision on matter that is not contested, question of whether certain documents were subject to Freedom of Information Act was rendered moot when par…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Jose B.
Finally, we conclude that, because the trial court lacked such statutory authority, that court properly concluded that the petitioner’s petition was rendered moot when he reached his eighteenth birthday. 8 See Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Rocque, 267 Conn. *583 116, 126-27, 836 A.2d 414 (2003) (case is moot when “[intervening circumstances have changed the legal landscape . . . and the court cannot grant the [petitioner] any practical relief’); see also Dept. of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information Commission, 103 Conn. App. 571, 589 , 930 A.2d 739 (because Freedom of In…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Albert G. BAGOLY, Jr.
v.
Frank J. RICCIO et al.
v.
Frank J. RICCIO et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 30, 2007.
Published
Terence D. Mariani, Waterbury, in support of the petition.
William F. Gallagher, in opposition.
[*246] The petition by the defendant Richard R. Burmeister for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 102 Conn.App. 792, 927 A.2d 950 (2007), is denied.