Lyon v. Jones, 943 A.2d 472 (Conn. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
Lyon v. Jones, 943 A.2d 472 (Conn. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
35 citation events (35 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Coury v. Coury (connappct, 2015-11-17)
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Coury v. Coury
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstein v. Weinstein, 104 Conn. App. 482, 494 , 934 A.2d 306 (2007) (‘‘[i]f we were to find from the record that the facts presented to the court established a substantial change of circumstances, we would be engaging in fact-finding, a function not the province of this court’’), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 911 , 943 A.2d 472 (2008).
cited Cited "see" Cifaldi v. Cifaldi
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstein v. Weinstein, 280 Conn. 764, 770 , 911 A.2d 1077 , after remand, 104 Conn. App. 482 , 934 A.2d 306 (2007), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 911 , 943 A.2d 472 (2008).
examined Cited "see" Gosselin v. Gosselin (3×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstein v. Weinstein, 104 Conn.App. 482, 494 , 934 A.2d 306 (2007), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 911 , 943 A.2d 472 (2008).
examined Cited "see" Crews v. Crews (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstein v. Weinstein, 104 Conn. App. 482, 487 , 934 A.2d 306 (2007), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 911 , 943 A.2d 472 (2008).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Geraldine D. Lyon
v.
Virginia Jones Et Al.
SC 18096.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 23, 2008.
943 A.2d 472
Norman A. Pattis, in support of the petition., Margaret Q. Chappie and Joseph A. Jordano, assistant attorney generals, in opposition.
Vertefeuille.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 104 Conn. App. 547 (AC 27510), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff was required to obtain an authorization from either the claims commissioner or the General Assembly in order to pursue her claims under General Statutes § 46a-60 (a) (1) pursuant to General Statutes §§ 4-141 through 4-165?

[*915] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18096. Norman A. Pattis, in support of the petition. Margaret Q. Chappie and Joseph A. Jordano, assistant attorney generals, in opposition. Decided January 23, 2008

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 46a-99 does not constitute a waiver of the state’s inununity for suits in damages?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.