green
Positive treatment
13.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Smollett
However, the situation is different when the nolle is entered as part of an agreement with the defendant: “A nolle may, however, be bargained for as part of a plea agreement; see State v. Daly, 111 Conn.App. 397 , 400 n.2, 960 A.2d 1040 (2008), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 909 , 973 A.2d 108 (2009); Practice Book § 39-5 (2); see also Mason v. State, 302 Md. 434, 440 , 488 A.2d 955 (1985) (nolle as part of plea agreement tantamount to dismissal of nolled charge); or as part of an agreement whereby - 24 - the defendant provides something else of benefit to the state or the victim in exchange for e…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Kallberg
A nolle may, however, be bargained for as part of a plea agreement; see State v. Daly, 111 Conn. App. 397 , 400 n.2, 960 A.2d 1040 (2008), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 909 , 973 A.2d 108 (2009); Practice Book § 39-5 (2); see also Mason v. State, 302 Md. 434, 440 , 488 A.2d 955 (1985) (nolle as part of plea agreement tantamount to dismissal of nolled charge); or as part of an agreement whereby the defendant provides something else of ben- efit to the state or the victim in exchange for entry of a nolle.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Kallberg
A nolle may, however, be bargained for as part of a plea agreement; see State v. Daly , 111 Conn.App. 397 , 400 n.2, 960 A.2d 1040 (2008), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 909 , 973 A.2d 108 (2009) ; Practice Book § 39-5 (2) ; see also Mason v. State , 302 Md. 434 , 440, 488 A.2d 955 (1985) (nolle as part of plea agreement tantamount to dismissal of nolled charge); or as part of an agreement whereby the defendant provides something else of benefit to the state or the victim in exchange for entry of a nolle.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Parker
(2×)
See State v. Dixon, 114 Conn. App. 1, 7-8 , 967 A.2d 1242 (noting that case law “suggest[s] that a defendant who does not challenge his sentence has no judicial remedy, by way of direct appeal or habeas corpus, to redact inaccurate statements of fact in a [presentence] report,” but leaving open possibility that “there might be some misstatements in a report that are so patently false, unreliable and harmful to the defendant’s future incarceration, probation or parole that he could challenge them on direct appeal from the sentence”), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 910 , 973 A.2d 108 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jefferson Solar, LLC v. FuelCell Energy, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Dixon, 114 Conn. App. 1, 9 , 967 A.2d 1242 (‘‘aggrievement or standing to appeal requires something more than con- jecture or speculation of injury’’), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 910 , 973 A.2d 108 (2009); Goldfisher v. Connecti- cut Siting Council, 95 Conn. App. 193, 198 , 895 A.2d 286 (2006) (‘‘mere speculation that harm may ensue is not an adequate basis for finding aggrievement’’).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Siddiqui
See, e.g., State v. Daly, 111 Conn. App. 397, 401 , 960 A.2d 1040 (2008), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 909 , 973 A.2d 108 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Commissioner of Correction
Small v. Commissioner of Correction , supra, at 717, 946 A.2d 1203 ("[t]he application of historical facts to questions of law that is necessary to determine whether the petitioner has demonstrated prejudice under Strickland ... is a mixed question of law and fact subject to our plenary review"); see also State v. Daly , 111 Conn.App. 397 , 400, 960 A.2d 1040 (2008) ("it is well established that as an appellate tribunal, we do not find facts"), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 909 , 973 A.2d 108 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Navarro
"Accordingly, we shall not review at this time ... the defendant's ineffective assistance claim[s] that he contends [are] adequately supported by the record. ... [W]e believe that his ineffective assistance claim[s] should be resolved ... after an evidentiary hearing in the trial court where the attorney whose conduct is in question may have an opportunity to testify." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Taft , 306 Conn. 749 , 769, 51 A.3d 988 (2012) ; see also State v. Daly , 111 Conn.App. 397 , 400, 960 A.2d 1040 (2008) ("it is well established that as an appellate tribunal, we do n…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Navarro
"Accordingly, we shall not review at this time ... the defendant's ineffective assistance [claim] that he contends [is] adequately supported by the record .... [W]e believe that his ineffective assistance [claim] should be resolved ... after an evidentiary hearing in the trial court where the attorney whose conduct is in question may have an opportunity to testify." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Taft , 306 Conn. 749 , 769, 51 A.3d 988 (2012) ; see also State v. Daly , 111 Conn.App. 397 , 400, 960 A.2d 1040 (2008) ("it is well established that as an appellate tribunal, we do not …
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
Robert DIXON.
v.
Robert DIXON.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 11, 2009.
Published
Ruth Daniella Weissman, special public defender, in support of the petition.
Richard K. Greenalch, Jr., special deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 114[*109] Conn.App. 1, 967 A.2d 1242 (AC 2009), is denied.