green
Positive treatment
10.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Southport Congregational Church-United Church of Christ v. Hadley
(2×)
See Heyse v. Case, 114 Conn. App. 640, 644 , 971 A.2d 699 (‘‘[t]here is no such thing as anticipatory mootness’’), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 905 , 976 A.2d 705 (2009). 4 We note that the sales contract in the present case refers to the decedent as the seller and to Winn as the buyer.
discussed
Cited "see"
Peterson v. Robles
See Martino v. Soalzo, 113 Conn. App. 240 , 242 n.2, 966 A.2d 339 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 904 , 976 A.2d 705 (2009) (“[our Supreme Court has] consistently held that [our courts should] not render advisory opinions” [internal quotation marks omitted]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mara v. Otto
(2×)
The record, viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs; see Heyse v. Case, 114 Conn. App. 640, 645 , 971 A.2d 699 , cert, denied, 293 Conn. 905 , 976 A.2d 705 (2009); reveals the following facts and procedural history.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. McLaren
See State v. Collazo, 113 Conn. App. 651, 673 , 967 A.2d 597 (“[argument is improper if the prosecutor draws conclusions for which there is no evidentiary support”), cert, denied, 293 Conn. 904 , 976 A.2d 705 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Paulino
See State v. Collazo, 113 Conn. App. 651, 663-65 , 967 A.2d 597 (trial court did not abuse discretion by denying *68 defendant’s motion for competency evaluation, despite fact that defendant and defense counsel engaged in “shouting matches” and defendant said he did not want defense counsel to represent him), cert, denied, 293 Conn. 904 , 976 A.2d 705 (2009); State v. Williams, supra, 65 Conn. App. 86 (defendant’s refusal to raise defense of insanity, as recommended by counsel, not indication of incompetency but rather disagreement over trial strategy).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Jaime S.
(2×)
See Heyse v. Case, 114 Conn. App. 640, 654 , 971 A.2d 699 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 905 , 976 A.2d 705 (2009).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Warren
See State v. Collazo, 113 Conn. App. 651, 668 , 967 A.2d 597 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 904 , 976 A.2d 705 (2009).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Collazo
See State v. Collazo, 113 Conn. App. 651 , 967 A.2d 597 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 904 , 976 A.2d 705 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rockstone Capital, LLC v. Sanzo
The interpretation of pleadings presents a question of law over which our review is plenary." Landry v. Spitz , 102 Conn.App. 34 , 41, 925 A.2d 334 (2007) ; see also Martino v. Scalzo , 113 Conn.App. 240 , 245, 966 A.2d 339 ("[t]he construction of a pleading is a question of law, over which we exercise plenary review" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 904 , 976 A.2d 705 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance v. Sakon
(2×)
Co., 74 Conn. App. 1, 8 , 810 A.2d 306 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 946 , 815 A.2d 674 (2003); see also Heyse v. Case, 114 Conn. App. 640, 655 , 971 A. 2d 699 (implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing did not require insurer to waive policy exclusions, even if insurer were found to have exercised a contrary *385 option with respect to another policyholder with comparable insurance policy), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 905 , 976 A.2d 705 (2009).
Lauren HEYSE et al.
v.
William CASE et al.
v.
William CASE et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 23, 2009.
Published
Jonathan M. Starble, in support of the petition.
Kerry R. Callahan and David R. Makarewicz, Hartford, in opposition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 114 Conn.App. 640, 971 A.2d 699 (2009), is denied.