green
Positive treatment
8.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Estela v. Bristol Hospital, Inc.
See Beckenstein Enterprises-Prestige Park, LLC v. Keller , 115 Conn. App. 680 , 690-91, 974 A.2d 764 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 916 , 979 A.2d 488 (2009) ; see also footnote 3 of this opinion.
discussed
Cited "see"
Motzer v. Haberli
See Beckenstein Enterprises-Prestige Park, LLC v. Keller, 115 Conn. App. 680, 691 , 974 A.2d 764 (“[this court has] never found an abuse of discretion in denying an amendment on the eve of trial, long after the conclusion of pretrial proceedings” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert, denied, 293 Conn. 916 , 979 A.2d 488 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
Logan v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction, 114 Conn. App. 778, 796 , 971 A.2d 766 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 915 , 979 A.2d 488 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thoma v. Watson
Realty, Inc., 145 Conn. App. 696, 711 , 77 A.3d 165 (2013), aff’d, 315 Conn. 596 , 109 A.3d 473 (2015); see also Beckenstein Enterprises-Prestige Park, LLC v. Keller, 115 Conn. App. 680 , 689–90, 974 A.2d 764 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 916 , 979 A.2d 488 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sokolovsky v. Mulholland
Moreover, our Supreme Court expressly has held that matters in avoidance of a statute of limitations ‘‘need not be pleaded in the complaint.’’ Ross Realty Corp. v. Surkis, 163 Conn. 388, 392 , 311 A.2d 74 (1972) (‘‘[i]t has been and is the holding of this court that matters in avoidance of the [s]tatute of [l]imitations need not be pleaded in the complaint but only in response to such a defense properly raised’’); see also, e.g., Beckenstein Enter- prises-Prestige Park, LLC v. Keller, 115 Conn. App. 680, 691 , 974 A.2d 764 (‘‘we conclude that the court properly denied the p…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arroyo v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. Duntz , 223 Conn. 207 , 236, 613 A.2d 224 (1992) (statements made by attorneys not facts in evidence; finder of fact may not properly consider them as evidence); Tevolini v. Tevolini , 66 Conn.App. 16 , 26, 783 A.2d 1157 (2001) ("representations of counsel are not, legally speaking, evidence" [internal quotation marks omitted] ); see also Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction , 114 Conn.App. 778 , 784, 971 A.2d 766 (habeas court's factual findings reviewed under clearly erroneous standard), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 915 , 979 A.2d 488 (2009).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Zollo v. Commissioner of Correction
(4×)
But where successive petitions are premised on the same legal grounds and seek the same relief, the second petition will not survive a motion to dismiss unless the petition is supported by allegations and facts not reasonably available to the petitioner at the time of the original petition.” [Internal quotation marks omitted.]); see also Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction, 114 Conn. App. 778, 794 , 971 A.2d 766 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 915 , 979 A.2d 488 (2009) (same); Mejia v. Commissioner of Correction, supra, 98 Conn. App. 189 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tobias C. Anderson
v.
Commissioner of Correction
v.
Commissioner of Correction
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 17, 2009.
Tobias C. Anderson, pro se, in support of the petition.
Published
The petitioner Tobias C. Anderson’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 114 Conn. App. 778 (AC 29430), is denied.
KATZ and McLACHLAN, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
[*916] Tobias C. Anderson, pro se, in support of the petition. Decided September 17, 2009