Concerned Citizens for the Prot. of Watertown, Inc. v. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 987 A.2d 1028 (Conn. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Concerned Citizens for the Prot. of Watertown, Inc. v. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 987 A.2d 1028 (Conn. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (36 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kuehl v. Koskoff (connappct, 2018-06-12)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Kuehl v. Koskoff (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Byrne v. Grasso , 118 Conn. App. 444 , 451-52, 985 A.2d 1064 (2009) (to prove damages for alleged malpractice in challenging claim for attorney's fees, plaintiff had to present expert testimony that, without malpractice, fee challenge could have been successful), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 934 , 987 A.2d 1028 (2010) ; Dixon v. Bromson & Reiner , 95 Conn. App. 294 , 299-300, 898 A.2d 193 (2006) (in legal malpractice case expert witness is necessary to opine that defendant's alleged breach of standard of care proximately caused plaintiff's alleged loss or damages; judge not expert in every area…
discussed Cited "see" Romanczak v. AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Byrne v. Grasso, 118 Conn. App. 444, 451-52 , 985 A.2d 1064 (2009) (burden on plaintiff to prove basis of challenge to attorney’s fees), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 934 , 987 A.2d 1028 (2010).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kalra v. Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C. (2×)
D. Conn. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Vona v. Lerner, 72 Conn. App. 179 , 189–92, 804 A.2d 1018 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 938 , 815 A.2d 138 (2003) (holding that trial court properly granted defendants' motion for directed verdict on claim of legal malpractice in absence of expert testimony as to proximate cause); see Somma v. Gracey, 15 Conn. App. 371 , 374–75 (1988) (requiring expert testimony that breach of professional standard of care occurred and that breach was proximate cause of injuries suffered by plaintiff to establish legal malpractice); see also Byrne v. Grasso, 118 Conn. App. 444, 449 , 985 A.2d 1064 (2…
examined Cited "see, e.g." Grimm v. Fox (8×)
Conn. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Moore v. Crone, supra, 114 Conn.App. at 447-48 , 970 A.2d 757 (attorney failed to raise certain issues on appeal, failed to notice portion of trial transcript was missing, and failed to adequately brief issues on appeal ); see also Byrne v. Grasso, 118 Conn. App. 444, 450 , 985 A.2d 1064 (2009) (attorney failed to appear at hearing at which award of fees was made against client and failed to explain right to appeal fees ordered), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 934 , 987 A.2d 1028 (2010); Pagan v. Gonzalez, supra, at 138 n. 4, 965 A.2d 582 (criminal defense attorney failed to object, at sentencing…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Concerned Citizens for the Protection of Watertown, Inc.
v.
Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Watertown
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 28, 2010.
987 A.2d 1028
Kenneth R. Slater, Jr., in support of the petition., N. Warren Hess III, in opposition.
Vertefeuille.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn. App. 337 (AC 29658), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.