green
Positive treatment
10.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Benchmark Municipal Tax Services, Ltd. v. 899 ETG Associates, LLC
(2×)
See Massey v. Branford, 118 Conn. App. 491, 499 , 985 A.2d 335 (2009), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 913 , 990 A.2d 345 (2010). 0, 0 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 13 0 Conn. App. 1 ,0 15 Benchmark Municipal Tax Services, Ltd. v. 899 ETG Associates, LLC In the face of the parties’ modification agreement, the Silberstein affidavit was insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to 899 ETG’s unclean hands defense.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Brown
(2×)
See Massey v. Branford, 118 Conn. App. 491, 499 , 985 A.2d 335 (2009), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 913 , 990 A.2d 345 (2010). ‘‘[T]he threshold determination in the construction of a separation agreement . . . is whether, examining the relevant provisions in light of the context of the situation, the provision at issue is clear and unambigu- ous, which is a question of law over which our review is plenary.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Fazio v. Fazio, 162 Conn. App. 236 , 244, 131 A.3d 1162 , cert. denied, 320 Conn. 922 , 132 A.3d 1095 (2016).
discussed
Cited "see"
Meridian Partners, LLC v. Dragone Classic Motorcars, Inc.
(2×)
See Massey v. Branford , 118 Conn.App. 491 , 499, 985 A.2d 335 (2009) (settlement agreement unambiguous and complete on its face not made ambiguous by absence of provision for releases or absence of a merger clause), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 913 , 990 A.2d 345 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kopylec v. TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORD
(2×)
See Lallier v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 119 Conn. App. 71, 78-79 , 986 A.2d 343 , cert. denied, 295 Conn. 914 , 990 A.2d 345 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William Massey Et Al.
v.
Town of Branford Et Al.
v.
Town of Branford Et Al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 17, 2010.
William Massey, pro se, and Dawn Massey, pro se, in support of the petition., William H. Clendenen, Jr., in opposition.
Published
The petition by the plaintiffs William Massey and Dawn Massey for certification for appeal from the[*914] Appellate Court, 118 Conn. App. 491 (AC 28593), is denied.
William Massey, pro se, and Dawn Massey, pro se, in support of the petition. William H. Clendenen, Jr., in opposition. Decided March 17, 2010