Abrams v. Comm'r of Corr., 991 A.2d 564 (Conn. 2010). · Go Syfert
Abrams v. Comm'r of Corr., 991 A.2d 564 (Conn. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
51 citation events (51 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lewis v. Newtown (connappct, 2019-07-16)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Lewis v. Newtown
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See DeCorso v. Calderaro, 118 Conn. App. 617 , 627–28, 985 A.2d 349 (2009) (‘‘[i]n adju- dicating the motions for summary judgment, the [trial] court was not required to address trespass because the operative complaint did not contain counts alleging trespass’’), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 919 , 991 A.2d 564 (2010).
discussed Cited "see" Blumberg Associates Worldwide, Inc. v. Brown & Brown of Connecticut, Inc. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See DeCorso v. Calderaro, 118 Conn. App. 617, 622 , 985 A.2d 349 (2009) (“[t]he applicable rule regarding the material facts to be considered on a motion for summary judgment is that the facts at issue are those alleged in the pleadings” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 919 , 991 A.2d 564 (2010).
discussed Cited "see" William B. v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
“Because the petitioner must satisfy both prongs of the Strickland test to prevail on a habeas corpus petition, this court may dispose of the petitioner’s claim if he fails to meet either prong.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Morant v. Commissioner of Correction, supra, 117 Conn. App. 301 ; see Dorce v. Commissioner of Correction, 118 Conn. App. 750, 754 , 984 A.2d 1173 (“[a] reviewing court need not address both components of the inquiry if the [petitioner] makes an insufficient showing on one” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 919 , 991 A.2d 564 (20…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lavette v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., DeCorso v. Calderaro, 118 Conn. App. 617, 624 , 985 A.2d 349 (2009), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 919 , 991 A.2d 564 (2010). 7 General Statutes § 31-284 (a) provides: ‘‘An employer who complies with the requirements of subsection (b) of this section shall not be liable for any action for damages on account of personal injury sustained by an employee arising out of and in the course of his employment or on account of death resulting from personal injury so sustained, but an employer shall secure compensation for his employees as provided under this chapter, except that compensation s…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cammarota v. Guerrera (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 909 (1999); see also generally Rules of Professional Conduct 1.7 through 1.11.” Abrams v. Commissioner of Correction, 119 Conn. App. 414 , 419 n.4, 987 A.2d 370 , cert. denied, 295 Conn. 920 , 991 A.2d 564 (2010). 12 “[A] violation of a rule of professional conduct does not give rise to a cause of action nor should it create any presumption that a legal duty has been breached.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C. v. Beckett, 269 Conn. 613 , 636 n.17, 850 A.2d 145 (2004); see also Rules of Professional Conduct, scope.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kosiorek v. Smigelski
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
Analysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Dreambuilders Construction, LLC v. Diamond, 121 Conn. App. 554, 564 , 997 A.2d 553 (2010); see also Chase Home Finance, LLC v. Fequiere, 119 Conn. App. 570, 580 , 989 A.2d 606 (“mere conclusory assertions regarding a claim with no mention of relevant authority and minimal or no citations from the record will not suffice” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 922 , 991 A.2d 564 (2010). 20 The de…
David A. ABRAMS
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 30, 2010.
991 A.2d 564
Published

Matthew J. Collins, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The petitioner David A. Abrams' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 Conn.App. 414, 987 A.2d 370 (2010), is denied.