Alabama Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Reliance Ins. Co. in Liquidation, 121 A.3d 954 (Pa. 2015). · Go Syfert
Search
Alabama Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Reliance Ins. Co. in Liquidation, 121 A.3d 954 (Pa. 2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“where the trial court does not address the issues raised in an untimely 1925(b) statement, we remand to allow the trial court an opportunity to do so.”
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Rivera, D. (pasuperct, 2016-10-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Com. v. Rivera, D.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
where the trial court does not address the issues raised in an untimely 1925(b) statement, we remand to allow the trial court an opportunity to do so.
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Strafford
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Veon, 109 A.3d 754 , 775 (Pa.Super. 2015), appeal granted on other grounds, 121 A.3d 954 , 955 (Pa. 2015)("In order to preserve a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, the appellant's Rule 1925(b) statement must state with specificity the element or elements of the crime upon which the appellant alleges the evidence was insufficient.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Nolasco, U.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Commonwealth v. Thompson, 39 A.3d 335, 340 (Pa. Super. 2012) (“[w]hen counsel has filed an untimely Rule 1925(b) statement and the trial court has addressed those issues we . . . may address the merits of the issues presented.”) (citation omitted); see also Commonwealth v. Veon, 109 A.3d 754, 762 (Pa. Super. 2015), appeal granted in part, 121 A.3d 954 (Pa. 2015). -4- J-S69033-16 Commonwealth v. Palm, 903 A.2d 1244, 1246 (Pa. Super. 2006) (citations omitted).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Sult, M.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Commonwealth v. Thompson, 39 A.3d 335, 340 (Pa. Super. 2012) (“[w]hen counsel has filed an untimely Rule 1925(b) statement and the trial court has addressed those issues we . . . may address the merits of the issues presented.”) (citation omitted); see also Commonwealth v. Veon, 109 A.3d 754, 762 (Pa. Super. 2015), appeal granted in part, 121 A.3d 954 (Pa. 2015); Commonwealth v. Burton, 973 A.2d 428, 430-33 (Pa. Super. 2009) (en banc). -3- J-S58008-15 asserts that the court did not take into account either the victim’s belief that he has great potential or his rehabilitative needs.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ALABAMA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, Objector
v.
RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY IN LIQUIDATION (Ancillary Matter to in re: Reliance Insurance Company in Liquidation, No. 1 Rel 2001) Appeal of Alabama Insurance Guaranty Association, Objector
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug 17, 2015.
121 A.3d 954
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 83%
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (1)

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of August, 2015, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.