green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Palmenta v. Evangelidis
See State v. Palmenta, 323 Conn. 931 , 150 A.3d 231 (2016). 6 On a date not known to the Court, Palmenta also filed an application for sentence review in the Roxbury case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cimmino v. Marcoccia
See Szymonik v. Szymonik , 167 Conn. App. 641 , 656-57, 144 A.3d 457 ("[i]t is a fundamental tenet of due process that no court will proceed to the adjudication of a matter involving conflicting rights and interests, until all persons directly concerned in the event have been actually or constructively notified of the pendency of the proceeding, and given reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard ... in sufficient time to prepare their positions on the issues involved" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 323 Conn. 931 , 150 A.3d 232 (2016) ; see also Statewide Grievance Com…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cockayne v. Bristol Hospital, Inc.
To rule otherwise would permit trial by ambuscade.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Ferri v. Powell-Ferri, 317 Conn. 223 , 236–37, 116 A.3d 297 (2015); see also Szy- monik v. Szymonik, 167 Conn. App. 641, 650 , 144 A.3d 457 (party cannot adopt one position at trial and then different one on appeal), cert. denied, 323 Conn. 931 , 150 A.3d 232 (2016).
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Scott PALMENTA
v.
Scott PALMENTA
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 18, 2016.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 168 Conn.App. 37, 144 A.3d 503 (2016), is denied.
EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.