Erie Ins. Exch. v. Bristol, M., 160 A.3d 123 (Pa. 2016). · Go Syfert
Search
Erie Ins. Exch. v. Bristol, M., 160 A.3d 123 (Pa. 2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Fields, K. (pasuperct, 2018-10-17)
Under fire — who is questioning this case
Citations from separate opinions of courts that could overrule this case. This is a warning signal, not a treatment change. The flag color above is unaffected.
Concurrence Erie Insurance Exchange v. Bristol, M. (2017)
“Exch. v. Bristol, No. 439 MAL 2016, 2016 WL 7475709 (Pa. Dec. 29, 2016) (per curiam).”
Concurrence Erie Insurance Exchange v. Bristol (2017)
“Exch. v. Bristol, 639 Pa. 187 , 160 A.3d 123 , 2016 WL 7475709 (2016) (per curiam).”
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (rule) Com. v. Fields, K. (3×) also: Cited "see"
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · confidence medium
Rule 2119(a) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that the argument section of an appellate brief shall include “the particular point treated therein, followed by such discussion and citation of authorities as are deemed pertinent.” Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a). - 10 - J-E01002-18 & J-E01003-18 appellant “did not dispute that the four-year limitations period commenced on the date of the accident.” Id. at 126 (Wecht, J. dissenting).
examined Cited as authority (rule) Commonwealth v. Fields (3×) also: Cited "see"
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · confidence medium
Dissenting, Justice Wecht noted that throughout the litigation before this Court, the appellant "did not dispute that the four-year limitations period commenced on the date of the accident." Id. at 126 (Wecht, J. dissenting).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Erie Insurance Exchange v. Bristol
Pa. · 2017 · confidence medium
The Majority begins by purporting to adopt the issue statement “as originally framed in [Bristol’s] Petition for Allowance of Appeal,” but then proceeds to venture that it “understands this issue to encompass” arguments regarding when “a cause of action accrues—thereby triggering the commencement of the statutory period for bringing a claim.” Per Curiam Order at 189, 160 A.3d at 123-24.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
v.
Michael BRISTOL and RCC, Inc. Petition Of: Michael Bristol
439 MAL 2016 (Granted).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec 29, 2016.
160 A.3d 123
Per Curiam.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

[*188] ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

In uninsured motorist claims subject to mandatory arbitration, is the statute of limitations tolled only by the commencement of an official judicial action, or may extrajudicial actions also toll the statute of limitations?