green
Positive treatment
13.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Douglas C.
See State v. Reed, 176 Conn. App. 537 , 540 n.3, 169 A.3d 326 , cert. denied, 327 Conn. 974 , 174 A.3d 194 (2017). 6 The victim initially described this abuse in a videotaped diagnostic inter- view with a clinical child interview supervisor when she was approximately thirteen years old.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Shin
See State v. Biggs, 176 Conn. App. 687 , 695 n.5, 171 A.3d 457 , cert. denied, 327 Conn. 975 , 174 A.3d 193 (2017). 15 The following colloquy occurred between the state and D: ‘‘Q. . . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Presidential Village, LLC v. Perkins
(2×)
Although the certified questions are framed in relation to whether state summary process law is relevant to the propriety of the federal notice; see Presidential Village, LLC v. Perkins , 327 Conn. 974 , 174 A.3d 193 (2017) ; 11 we conclude that, because the notice is jurisdictionally defective even if measured solely by reference to federal law, we need not consider whether, and the extent to which, state law would be relevant.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Montanez
See State v. Biggs , 176 Conn. App. 687 , 706, 171 A.3d 457 , cert. denied, 327 Conn. 975 , 174 A.3d 193 (2017).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Walker
See State v. Biggs , 176 Conn. App. 687 , 714, 171 A.3d 457 , cert. denied, 327 Conn. 975 , 174 A.3d 193 (2017).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Devin M.
App. 603–604; see also State v. Biggs, 176 Conn. App. 687, 704 , 171 A.3d 457 (‘‘we recognize that the trial court has wide latitude in fashioning the proper response to allegations of juror [misconduct]’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 327 Conn. 975 , 174 A.3d 193 (2017). ‘‘In Brown, [our Supreme Court] noted that ‘[t]here may well be cases . . . in which a trial court will right- fully be persuaded, solely on the basis of the allegations before it and the preliminary inquiry of counsel on the record, that such allegations lack any merit.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Daley v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
Although there had not been any overt indication prior to the jury returning its verdict that R.L. may have been suffering from a medical condition that rendered her incompetent during her jury service, we conclude that R.L.'s statements to Judge Rush and her letter submitted to the court constitute strong evidence that R.L. likely had been incompetent during her jury service, such that a full inquiry by the court into R.L.'s competency was necessary. 12 Thus, the *643 court erred in failing to hold a postverdict evidentiary *600 hearing to determine whether R.L. had been competent to serve as…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Turner
The appellate tribunal is free, therefore, to respond to the defendant's claim by focusing on whichever condition is most relevant in the particular circumstances." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) *467 State v. Steele , supra, 176 Conn. App. at 15 n.8, 169 A.3d 797 ; see also State v. Biggs , 176 Conn. App. 687 , 705-706, 171 A.3d 457 , cert. denied, 327 Conn. 975 , 174 A.3d 193 (2017).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PRESIDENTIAL VILLAGE, LLC
v.
Tonya PERKINS
v.
Tonya PERKINS
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 29, 2017.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 176 Conn. App. 493, 170 A.3d 701 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court's holding that a federal pretermination notice for nonpayment of rent must be limited to rent charges that are a permissible basis for such an eviction under Connecticut summary process law?
"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that state law is not relevant in determining whether the information provided in a federal pretermination notice is so misleading as to render it jurisdictionally defective?