discussed Cited "see" State v. Vickers See State v. Eddie N. C., 178 Conn. App. 147 , 158 n.9, 174 A.3d 803 (2017), cert. denied, 327 Conn. 1000 , 176 A.3d 558 (2018). ‘‘In State v. DeJesus, [ 288 Conn. 418, 466 , 953 A.2d 45 (2008), our Supreme Court] held that, in cases involving sexual misconduct, [e]vidence of [other sexual] misconduct is admissible [for propensity purposes] if the offense is proxi- mate in time, similar to the offense charged, and committed with persons similar to the prosecuting witness. . . .

discussed Cited "see" State v. Vickers See State v. Eddie N. C., 178 Conn. App. 147 , 158 n.9, 174 A.3d 803 (2017), cert. denied, 327 Conn. 1000 , 176 A.3d 558 (2018). ‘‘In State v. DeJesus, [ 288 Conn. 418, 466 , 953 A.2d 45 (2008), our Supreme Court] held that, in cases involving sexual misconduct, [e]vidence of [other sexual] misconduct is admissible [for propensity purposes] if the offense is proxi- mate in time, similar to the offense charged, and committed with persons similar to the prosecuting witness. . . .

discussed Cited "see" State v. Abraham See State v. Eddie N.C. , 178 Conn. App. 147 , 173, 174 A.3d 803 (2017) ("[a] nonconstitutional error is harmless when an appellate court has a fair assurance that the error did not substantially affect the verdict" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 327 Conn. 1000 , 176 A.3d 558 (2018).