Del. Riverkeeper Network v. Middlesex Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd., 190 A.3d 1126 (Pa. 2018). · Go Syfert
Del. Riverkeeper Network v. Middlesex Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd., 190 A.3d 1126 (Pa. 2018). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: CONVERY v. MCGINLEY (paed, 2023-11-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" CONVERY v. MCGINLEY
E.D. Pa. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See 3 Commonwealth v. Convery, 190 A.3d 1126 (Pa. 2018).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Convery, R. Jr.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Convery, 190 A.3d 1126 (Pa. 2018).
cited Cited "see" D. Frederick, P. Hagaman, and B. Taylor v. Allegheny Twp. ZHB v. CNX Gas Company, LLC. v. Allegheny Twp. v. J.H. Slike and A.E. Slike, Northmoreland Farms LP v. M. Golembeiwski
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See 190 A.3d 1126 (Pa., No. 270 WAL 2017, filed August 3, 2018) (per curiam order).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK, Clean Air Council, David Denk, Jennifer Chomicki, and Joann Groman, Petitioners
v.
MIDDLESEX TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD, Respondent v. R.E. Gas Development, LLC, Middlesex Township, and Robert G. Geyer, Respondent
270 WAL 2017.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug 3, 2018.
190 A.3d 1126
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK, Clean Air Council, David Denk, Jennifer Chomicki, and Joann Groman, Petitioners v. MIDDLESEX TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD, Respondent v. R.E. Gas Development, LLC, Middlesex Township, and Robert G. Geyer, Respondent
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 3 rd day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for reconsideration of its decision in light of Pa. Envtl. Def. Found. v. Commonwealth, 640 Pa. 55 , 161 A.3d 911 (2017). In addition, in light of the amendments contained in Middlesex Township Ordinance 127, which expressly include gas well development as a permitted use in the subject R-AG zone, and our decision in Gorsline v. Bd. of Sup. of Fairfield Twp., ___ Pa. ___, 186 A.3d 375 (2018) wherein we noted "this decision should not be misconstrued as an indication that oil and gas development is never permitted in residential/agricultural districts, or that it is fundamentally incompatible with residential or agricultural uses," we direct the Commonwealth Court to reconsider the relevance of Gorsline to its analysis of the issues on appeal in this case.