Com. v. Montelione, 34 A.3d 828 (Pa. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Com. v. Montelione, 34 A.3d 828 (Pa. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“directed entirely to the credibility of the commonwealth's chief witness, appellant's claim challenges the weight, not the sufficiency, of the evidence.”
43 citation events (43 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Reid, J., Jr. (pasuperct, 2017-07-27)
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Com. v. Reid, J., Jr.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
directed entirely to the credibility of the commonwealth's chief witness, appellant's claim challenges the weight, not the sufficiency, of the evidence.
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Moody, B.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Moody, 24 A.3d 449 (Pa. Super.) (unpublished memorandum), appeal denied, 34 A.3d 828 (Pa. 2011).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Bishop, T.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. McKellick, 24 A.3d 982, 987 (Pa. Super.) (referring to a “video tape” as “demonstrative or physical evidence”), appeal denied, 34 A.3d 828 (Pa. 2011); Commonwealth v. Conway, 534 A.2d 541 , 544 n.3 (Pa. Super. 1987) (same), appeal denied, 549 A.2d 914 (Pa. 1988).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Williams, A.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Palo, 24 A.3d 1050, 1054 (Pa. Super. 2011) (classifying a challenge to the credibility of the Commonwealth’s witness as an argument going to the weight, not sufficiency, of the evidence), appeal denied, 34 A.3d 828 (Pa. 2011).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Smith, K.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Commonwealth v. Palo, 24 A.3d 1050, 1057-58 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 613 Pa. 663 , 34 A.3d 828 (2011) (emphasizing need for developed, reasoned, intelligent argument appropriate for appellate review; otherwise, issue is subject to waiver).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Ruggles, R.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
However, his allegation that Miller and Rohrbach’s prior convictions for crimes of dishonesty render them incredible, also goes to the weight of the evidence, not sufficiency, as claimed by Appellant.11 (See id.); see also Commonwealth v. Palo, 24 A.3d 1050, 1055 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 34 A.3d 828 (Pa. 2011) (“Directed entirely to the credibility of ____________________________________________ 11 Specifically, Appellant argues that the witnesses’ testimony “should have been impeached and determined to be incredible” because they “have extensive criminal histories which i…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Harrell
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Palo, 24 A.3d 1050, 1058 (Pa.Super.), appeal denied, 613 Pa. 663 , 34 A.3d 828 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COM.
v.
MONTELIONE.
492 MAL (2011).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec 8, 2011.
34 A.3d 828
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 83%
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (1)

Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied.