Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. SIEJACK, 5 A.3d 60 (Md. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. SIEJACK, 5 A.3d 60 (Md. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“if sovereign immunity were not in the picture, we believe that the three-year period set forth in cjp 5-101 would control 530 an unjust enrichment claim.”
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jason v. National Loan Recoveries, LLC (mdctspecapp, 2016-04-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Jason v. National Loan Recoveries, LLC
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2016 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
if sovereign immunity were not in the picture, we believe that the three-year period set forth in cjp 5-101 would control 530 an unjust enrichment claim.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner
v.
Richard T. SIEJACK, Respondent.
Misc. Docket AG No. 19, Sept. Term, 2010.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Sep 28, 2010.
5 A.3d 60
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 59%
Citer courts: Court of Special Appeals of Ma… (1)

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension By Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 28th day of September, 2010,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Richard T. Siejack be, and he hereby is, indefinitely suspended by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective November 1, 2010, with a right to petition for reinstatement no sooner than six months from the effective date of the suspension; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court, on November 1, 2010, shall strike the name of Richard T. Siejack from the register of attorneys in this Court and, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d), shall certify to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the state that the name of Richard T. Siejack has been so stricken.