green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Santiago v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
But cf. People by Abrams v. Hamilton, 125 A.D.2d 1000 , 511 N.Y.S.2d 190 (1996) (administration of polygraph may be unlawful sex discrimination); Zampatori v. United Parcel Service, 125 Misc.2d 405 , 479 N.Y.S.2d 470 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1984) (action sounds in negligent misrepresentation theory).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Gordon v. PL Long Beach, LLC
Additionally, facts sufficient to sustain a cause of action under Executive Law § 296 will support a cause of action under Civil Rights Law § 40-c (see Samper v University of Rochester, 144 AD2d 940, 941 [1988]; People v Hamilton, 125 AD2d 1000, 1001 [1986]; see also Illiano v Mineola Union Free School Dist., 585 F Supp 2d 341, 352-353 [2008]; Ganzy v Allen Christian School, 995 F Supp 340, 350 [1998]).
cited
Cited "see"
PEOPLE OF STATE OF NY EX REL. SPITZER v. Kraeger
See People v. Hamilton, 125 A.D.2d 1000, 1001 , 511 N.Y.S.2d 190 (N.Y.App.
cited
Cited "see"
Ganzy v. Allen Christian School
See People v. Hamilton, 125 A.D.2d 1000, 1001 , 511 N.Y.S.2d 190 (N.Y.App.Div.1986); Samper v. Univ. of Rochester, 144 A.D.2d 940, 941 , 535 N.Y.S.2d 281 (N.Y.App.Div.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trent v. Valley Electric Ass'n, Inc.
See People v. Hamilton, 125 A.D.2d 1000 , 511 N.Y.S.2d 190 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1986) (employer liable when it failed to discharge an independent polygraph operator who sexually harassed employees); see also Waltman v. Int’l Paper Co., 875 F.2d 468 (5th Cir.1989) (triable issue whether employer took prompt remedial action in response to allegations of sexual harassment, some involving employees of independent contractor). .
discussed
Cited "see"
66 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 769, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,388 Victoria L. Trent, AKA Victoria L. Winebarger v. Valley Electric Association Inc. Richard Burasco Ross Dohlen
See People v. Hamilton, 125 A.D.2d 1000 , 511 N.Y.S.2d 190 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1986) (employer liable when it failed to discharge an independent polygraph operator who sexually harassed employees); see also Waltman v. Int'l Paper Co., 875 F.2d 468 (5th Cir.1989) (triable issue whether employer took prompt remedial action in response to allegations of sexual harassment, some involving employees of independent contractor) 2 We do not decide whether or not summary judgment would be appropriate on the second or third elements of Trent's prima facie case
discussed
Cited "see"
PEOPLE OF STATE OF NY, BY ABRAMS v. Merlino
See People of The State of New York v. Hamilton, 125 A.D.2d 1000 , 511 N.Y.S.2d 190 (4th Dept.1986) (wherein appellate court af *1105 firmed lower court order with respect to sexual discrimination in violation of New York Human Rights and Civil Rights Laws even without claim of economic injury); State University of New York at Albany v. State Human Rights Appeal Board, 81 A.D.2d 688 , 438 N.Y.S.2d 643 (3d Dept. 1981) (proceeding arose from charges of sexual discrimination in form of sexual harassment occurring in workplace); Rudow v. New York City Commission on Human Rights, 123 Misc.2d 709 , …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clifford Hayden
v.
Helen Walters
v.
Helen Walters
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 19, 1986.
Published
— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in memorandum decision at Supreme Court, McLaughlin, J. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, McLaughlin, J. — constructive trust.) Present— Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.