People v. Thomas, 300 A.D.2d 196 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Thomas, 300 A.D.2d 196 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tsabbar, D.D.S. v. Auld (nyappdiv, 2006-02-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Tsabbar, D.D.S. v. Auld
N.Y. App. Div. · 2006 · confidence medium
Three years ago, in affirming the dismissal of certain of plaintiffs claims against defendants as barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, we warned plaintiff that further litigation against these defendants would be sanctionable pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (a) and (c) (Tsabbar v Delena, 300 AD2d at 197).
discussed Cited "see" 17 East 89th Street Tenants, Inc. v. Tsabbar
N.Y. App. Div. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
Defendant is barred by collateral estoppel and res judicata from seeking to compel plaintiff to appear for pretrial examination for the purpose of trying to verify his right to sublet, because this issue has already been decided in prior litigation, viz., Tsabbar v Auld ( 276 AD2d 442 [2000]; 289 AD2d 115 [2001], lv denied 98 NY2d 613 [2002]; see Tsabbar v Delena, 300 AD2d 196 , 197 [2002], lv denied 100 NY2d 508 [2003]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Jason Thomas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 24, 2002.
300 A.D.2d 196
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Stone, J.), rendered May 31, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly enhanced defendant’s promised sentence (see People v Outley, 80 NY2d 702). The court clearly imposed a condition requiring defendant to meet and cooperate with the Department of Probation, which defendant concededly failed to do. Defendant’s claim that his refusal was due to illness is not substantiated by the record.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.