examined Cited "but see" Universal Acupuncture Pain Services, P.C. v. Quadrino & Schwartz, P.C. (3×) also: Cited as authority (rule) But see Corsi v. Ott, 44 A.D.2d 906, 906 , 357 N.Y.S.2d 746, 747 (4th Dep't 1974) (mem.) (ordering that a quantum meruit fee "should be made as a charging lien upon any recovery had in the action"). 7 If a client who retained an attorney under a contingent-fee agreement discharges that attorney because there is no chance of recovery for the client, the discharge may be for cause, and the attorney may not be entitled to fees in quantum meruit.

examined Cited "but see" Universal Acupuncture Pain Services, P.C. v. Quadrino & Schwartz, P.C. (3×) also: Cited as authority (rule) But see Corsi v. Ott, 44 A.D.2d 906, 906 , 357 N.Y.S.2d 746, 747 (4th Dep't 1974) (mem.) (ordering that a quantum meruit fee “should be made as a charging lien upon any recovery had in the action”). .

discussed Cited "see" Compania Sud-Americana De Vapores S.A. v. IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Co. (2×) See FMC Corp. v. Seal Tape Ltd., Inc., 90 Misc.2d 1043 , 396 N.Y.S.2d 993, 996 (1977) (citing Pennsylvania Gas Co. v. Secord Brothers, Inc., 73 Misc.2d 1031 , 343 N.Y.S.2d 256 (1973), aff'd, 44 A.D.2d 906 , 357 N.Y.S.2d 702 (1974)).