Tomaszewski v. Martinez, 81 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Tomaszewski v. Martinez, 81 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Menefee v. Floyd & Beasley Transportation Co. (nyappdiv, 1984-12-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Menefee v. Floyd & Beasley Transportation Co.
N.Y. App. Div. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
Plaintiffs’ reliance on the case of Tomaszewski v Cleveland ( 55 NY2d 852 ) is misplaced since the defendants there failed to preserve their objection to Setder-based jurisdiction either by answer or preanswer motion (CPLR 3211, subd [e]; see Tomaszewski v Cleveland, 103 Misc 2d 355 , affd 81 AD2d 1018 , revd 55 NY2d 852 , supra).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lottie Tomaszewski
v.
Gloria Martinez
Appeal No. 2.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
May 27, 1981.
81 A.D.2d 1018
Published

— Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Same memorandum as in Tomaszewski v Martinez (81 AD2d 1018). (Appeal from order and judgment of Erie Supreme Court — summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Doerr and Moule, JJ.