green
Positive treatment
8.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Fagnani v. Honeywell
Comm’n, 113 Ariz. 285, 287 (1976) (explaining the burden shifts to the employer only if the worker shows reasonable efforts to obtain employment).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Smith v. adoc/doa Risk Management
Comm’n, 113 Ariz. 285, 287 (1976). “[E]vidence of the number of openings, without evidence of the number of applicants or the willingness of the employers to hire someone with a previous disability” is insufficient to sustain an award.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
D'AMICO v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
Id. at 581, 672 P.2d at 925 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Macias v. Industrial Commission
See Roach, supra; Dean v. Industrial Commission, 113 Ariz. 285, 287 , 551 P.2d 554, 556 (1976); Davis, supra. We do not believe the finding of the administrative law judge was reasonably supported by “competent or substantial” evidence.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
MacIas v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
See Roach, supra; Dean v. Industrial Commission, 113 Ariz. 285, 287 , 551 P.2d 554, 556 (1976); Davis, supra. We do not believe the finding of the administrative law judge was reasonably supported by "competent or substantial" evidence.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Roach v. Industrial Commission
Roach’s employment in Texas and unsuccessful subsequent attempts to find other work in Texas (Finding 10) were “reasonable efforts to secure suitable employment in the area of his residence.” Dean v. Industrial Commission, 113 Ariz. 285, 287 , 551 P.2d 554, 556 (1976).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Roach v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
Roach's employment in Texas and unsuccessful subsequent attempts to find other work in Texas (Finding 10) were "reasonable efforts to secure suitable employment in the area of his residence." Dean v. Industrial Commission, 113 Ariz. 285, 287 , 551 P.2d 554, 556 (1976).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Zimmerman v. Industrial Commission
Justice Struckmeyer’s phrase in Dean, supra, was “[m]aterial evidence to show, with reasonable certainty, that a claimant could secure a position.” 113 Ariz. at 287 , 551 P.2d at 556 (emphasis supplied).
discussed
Cited "see"
Neko Anthony Wilson v. Hon. higgins/state
See id. at 446–47; see also State v. Falco, 162 Ariz. 319, 321 (App. 1989) (citing Rule 26.1 comment and concluding that “although an order imposing probation is not ordinarily a sentence, see [Muldoon, 159 Ariz. at 298 ], when used in the context of Rule 26 and, by inference, Rule 24.3 [authorizing a court to correct ‘any unlawful sentence’], the term ‘sentence’ does include probation”); Ariz. R.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jenkins
(2×)
See State v. Fuentes, 26 Ariz.App. 444, 450 , 549 P.2d 224, 230 (1976) (“Double jeopardy principles do not proscribe successive or multiple facets of an otherwise constitutionally acceptable punishment scheme adopted by a state as punishment to be imposed as the result of any one particular conviction.”), aff'd, 113 Ariz. 285 , 551 P.2d 554 (1976) (approving opinion of Court of Appeals).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pennington v. State
(2×)
Accord State v. Fuentes, 26 Ariz. App. 444 , 549 P.2d 224 , aff'd, 113 Ariz. 285 , 551 P.2d 554 (1976) (adopting lower court opinion); People ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McSpadden v. Big Ben Coal Co.
(2×)
See, e. g., Dean v. Industrial Commission, 113 Ariz. 285 , 551 P.2d 554 (1976); Franklin Fabricators v. Irwin, 306 A.2d 734 (Del.1973).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Jett v. Leverette
(4×)
Compare State v. Jones, 327 So.2d 18 (Fla. 1976), with State v. Fuentes, 26 Ariz.App. 444 , 549 P.2d 224 (1976), aff'd without comment, 113 Ariz. 285 , 551 P.2d 554 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Industrial Commission
(2×)
See also Dean v. Industrial Commission, 113 Ariz. 285 , 551 P.2d 554 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The STATE of Arizona, Appellee,
v.
Ismael FUENTES, Appellant
v.
Ismael FUENTES, Appellant
3540-PR.
Arizona Supreme Court.
Jun 24, 1976.
Bruce E. Babbitt, Atty. Gen., by Shirley H. Frondorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, and Raymond Aaron Kizer, Certified Third Year Law Student Under Rule 28(e), 17A A.R.S., Rules of the Supreme Court, for appellee., Martin, Feldhacker & Friedl by William J. Friedl, Phoenix for appellant.
Cameron, Struckmeyer, Hays, Holohan, Gordon.
Cited by 23 opinions | Published
CAMERON, Chief Justice.
Petition for Review granted. The majority opinion of the Court of Appeals as reported in 26 Ariz.App. 444, 549 P.2d 224 (1976) is approved and adopted as the opinion of this court.
STRUCKMEYER, V. C. J., and HAYS, HOLOHAN and GORDON, JJ., concur.