Matthiessen v. Montecito Cnty. Water Dist., 22 P.2d 19 (Cal. 1933). · Go Syfert
Search
Matthiessen v. Montecito Cnty. Water Dist., 22 P.2d 19 (Cal. 1933). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Rank v. (Krug) United States (casd, 1956-07-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Rank v. (Krug) United States
S.D. Cal. · 1956 · confidence medium
Co., 1935, 8 Cal.App.2d 226 , 47 P.2d 522 Matthiessen v. Montecito County Water District, 1933, 217 Cal. 788 , 22 P.2d 19 Meridian, Ltd. v. City and County of San Francisco, 1939, 13 Cal.2d 424 , 90 P.2d 537 , 91 P.2d 105 Merritt v. City of Los Angeles, 1912, 162 Cal. 47 , 120 P. 1064 Miller v. Bay Cities Water Co., 1910, 157 Cal. 256 , 107 P. 115 Miller v. Robertson, 1924, 266 U.S. 243 , 45 S.Ct. 73 *190 Miller & Lux, Inc., v. Enterprise C. & L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
F.W. Matthiessen
v.
Montecito County Water District (A County Water District)
Docket No. L.A. 12832..
California Supreme Court.
Apr 3, 1933.
22 P.2d 19
James F. Peck, Charles F. Blackstock and Elizabeth M. Maxwell for Appellants. William P. Hubbard, as Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Appellants. J.F. Goux, City Attorney, Heaney, Price Postel and W.G. Irving for Respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

THE COURT.

[1] The appeal in this case involves the same questions presented in the case of Gin S. Chow v. City of SantaBarbara, (L.A. No. 12834) ante, p. 673 [22 P.2d 5], this day decided, and by stipulation was submitted on the same briefs filed in that case. On the authority of that case the judgment herein is affirmed.

Preston, J., dissented.

Rehearing denied.

Preston, J., dissented.